Re: RPZ Errors

2013-11-13 Thread Crist Clark
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:14:24AM -0500, Alan Clegg wrote: > > On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:13 AM, Crist Clark wrote: > > > From the initial mail: "This is BIND 9.9.2 (Infoblox 6.7.3)." > > > > No huge increase in resource usage noted. > > Has the vendor in question provided a response? > > Having

Re: RPZ Errors

2013-11-12 Thread Alan Clegg
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:13 AM, Crist Clark wrote: > From the initial mail: "This is BIND 9.9.2 (Infoblox 6.7.3)." > > No huge increase in resource usage noted. Has the vendor in question provided a response? Having worked on Frankenstein versions of BIND in the past (Hi, Redhat!), I’d be leer

Re: RPZ Errors

2013-11-11 Thread Crist Clark
>From the initial mail: "This is BIND 9.9.2 (Infoblox 6.7.3)." No huge increase in resource usage noted. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 08/11/13 23:52, Crist Clark wrote: > >> I've just set up an RPZ using a third party feed. I am getting lots and >> lots of "info" and

Re: RPZ Errors

2013-11-11 Thread Phil Mayers
On 08/11/13 23:52, Crist Clark wrote: I've just set up an RPZ using a third party feed. I am getting lots and lots of "info" and "warning" messages in the logs. However, I am not sure whether they actually are indicative of a problem I that may be impacting operations or just a "nice to know" abo

RPZ Errors

2013-11-08 Thread Crist Clark
I've just set up an RPZ using a third party feed. I am getting lots and lots of "info" and "warning" messages in the logs. However, I am not sure whether they actually are indicative of a problem I that may be impacting operations or just a "nice to know" about something over which I have no contro