Re: RNDC Stats

2019-01-25 Thread Tony Finch
N. Max Pierson wrote: > > Under Incoming Requests it has QUERY's among some other stats. Is this > the total queries across all zones? If it is, it doesn't seem to add up > to what the total of each zone added together in the per zone stats. Hmm, good question. I suspected it might be something t

RNDC Stats

2019-01-24 Thread N. Max Pierson
Hi List, I am trying to pull some metrics from our bind servers and I don't quite understand what some for the stats in the file really mean. What I am looking for is total queries and then a breakdown of total queries for each zone. Under Incoming Requests it has QUERY's among some other stats. I

rndc stats - referral versus failure

2013-04-09 Thread M. Meadows
Looking at rndc stats output on an older BIND 9.3 nameserver versus output on a new BIND 9.7 nameserver. It seems that the 9.3 and 9.7 referrals and failures are flipped in rndc stats output. Does that make sense? On the 9.3 nameserver I see a boatload of referrals and almost no failures

Re: rndc stats command

2012-07-23 Thread Ben
first time : 10.00 AM First i clean named_Stat file and then run rndc stats command so it will write statistics to named_stat file and then i collect incoming query numbers and cache hit ratio. Second time run same logic : 10.01 AM so this time i again get incoming query numbers and hit ratio

Re: rndc stats command

2012-07-18 Thread Chris Thompson
On Jul 18 2012, Ben wrote: Hi, As per man page and my understanding rndc stats writes a current named statistics into defined file in named.conf so suppose, if i run rndc stats command and then i take required information from named statistics file. And after some time, ( after 5 minutes

rndc stats command

2012-07-17 Thread Ben
Hi, As per man page and my understanding rndc stats writes a current named statistics into defined file in named.conf so suppose, if i run rndc stats command and then i take required information from named statistics file. And after some time, ( after 5 minutes or approx.) when i do again

Re: Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!

2012-01-30 Thread Peter Andreev
Sorry, Shiva I have confused you. Mark is absolutely right and I was wrong. Another way is to capture responses with tcpdump or dnscap. 2012/1/30 Mark Andrews > > In message < > canbtt6nxwb4fqygev4x8_jl+m5ho7wfenirxzg3pgvc-kzc...@mail.gmail.com> > , Shiva Raman writes: > > Hi Peter > > > > Thank

Re: Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!

2012-01-29 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Shiva Raman writes: > Hi Peter > > Thanks a lot for your reply. I had enabled query-errors with debug level 2 > in my bind logging, now i am able to log all SERVFAIL related error logs in > query-errors.log. But i am unable to log the NXDOMAIN error logs . NXDOMAIN is not a error.

Re: Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!

2012-01-29 Thread Shiva Raman
Hi Peter Thanks a lot for your reply. I had enabled query-errors with debug level 2 in my bind logging, now i am able to log all SERVFAIL related error logs in query-errors.log. But i am unable to log the NXDOMAIN error logs . Referring to Bind documentation, i enabled delegation-only option(wh

Re: Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!

2012-01-17 Thread Peter Andreev
2012/1/17 Shiva Raman > Hi All > > i am running Bind version 9.8.1 as an Authoritative Name server. From > the rndc.stats , i observe that there are some query failures happening > in the server. I am trying to get a detailed information of this query > failures, but the current logging option

Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!

2012-01-17 Thread Shiva Raman
Hi All i am running Bind version 9.8.1 as an Authoritative Name server. From the rndc.stats , i observe that there are some query failures happening in the server. I am trying to get a detailed information of this query failures, but the current logging options is not allowing me to get a detai

Re: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Thomas Schulz
rted in that output. >-Original Message- >From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org] >Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:51 PM >To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) >Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org >Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 > >On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Ciha

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
Maybe you need to fully stop the process and restart it. (Maybe old named is still running even though you replaced the binary.) ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
Teknoloji) Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: > As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2 > server in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have > an early vers

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
I checked and there isnt any rndc.conf... /var/named # /var/named #find / -name rndc.conf /var/named # /var/named # /var/named # And "which named" points to /usr/local/sbin/named (there isnt any other named either) and "rndc stats" dumps s

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: > As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2 server > in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have an early > version of p2 and things are changed after that time in the stats. > Because all the

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-18 Thread Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
age- From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:03 PM To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 Make sure you are really talking to the correct named. Maybe a you have a rndc.conf f

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-17 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
Make sure you are really talking to the correct named. Maybe a you have a rndc.conf file. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-17 Thread Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
- From: Matthew Huff [mailto:mh...@ox.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:17 PM To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji); 'bind-users@lists.isc.org' Cc: 'c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk' Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 There may be more than one "named" binary in your path. Y

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-17 Thread Matthew Huff
isc.org > Cc: c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk > Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 > > I think you're rigth, when I check the file sizes they are not same but > versions are matching... > > short > > -- > #ls -la > total 48166 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root other

RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-17 Thread Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
ers Mailing List Subject: Re: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 On Feb 17 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: >When I run "rndc stats" on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am >getting two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in >very short format >(7 l

Re: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-17 Thread Chris Thompson
On Feb 17 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: When I run "rndc stats" on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format (7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per d

rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2

2009-02-17 Thread Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
Hi, When I run "rndc stats" on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format (7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per dump)..What could be the difference on both? thank y