RE: zone serial (0) unchanged. zone may fail to transfer to slaves.

2012-02-06 Thread Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
>> Feb 4 15:53:46 nsb0s named[9090]: zone jspain.us/IN (signed): zone serial >> (2012013003) unchanged. zone may fail to transfer to slaves. > I suspect that is is benign. Had you just thawed the server/zone? After a review of the logs over the past several days, I see that this message occurr

Re: zone serial (0) unchanged. zone may fail to transfer to slaves.

2012-02-05 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <7610864823c0d04d89342623a3adc9de2e2fd...@hopple.countryday.net>, "Spain, D r. Jeffry A." writes: > >> named (BIND 9.7.4-P1) > >> err named[9964]: 05-Feb-2012 17:23:16.586 general: error: zone > >> 127.IN-ADDR.ARPA/IN/internal: zone serial (0) unchanged. zone may fail=20 > >> to trans

RE: zone serial (0) unchanged. zone may fail to transfer to slaves.

2012-02-05 Thread Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
>> named (BIND 9.7.4-P1) >> err named[9964]: 05-Feb-2012 17:23:16.586 general: error: zone >> 127.IN-ADDR.ARPA/IN/internal: zone serial (0) unchanged. zone may fail >> to transfer to slaves. > Ignore it. The message is suppressed in the next maintence release. I see similar messages in 9.9.0rc

Re: zone serial (0) unchanged. zone may fail to transfer to slaves.

2012-02-05 Thread Mark Andrews
Ignore it. The message is suppressed in the next maintence release. In message , Mohamed Lrhazi writes: > named (BIND 9.7.4-P1) fills up my log with these errors about various > zones which I do not find in name,conf on the slave nor on the master: > > err named[9964]: 05-Feb-2012 17:23:16.58