On 03.10.13 16:42, IT Support wrote:
Hi Mathus one thing more. I´m little bit lost in bind9. Can you tell
me which one those files where is defined the internal o external
host?
no. I would need to see those files to tell you where it is.
Simply check your named.copnf and resursively all incl
Hi Mathus one thing more. I´m little bit lost in bind9. Can you tell me
which one those files where is defined the internal o external host? If
is in mydomain.com.hosts.lan for internal and mydomain.com.hosts for
external I already put them in each configuration file. But I´m still
getting the
On 26.09.13 10:52, IT Support wrote:
Hi Matus thanks for your answer, can you do me a favor? can you tell
me how to looking for that configuration?
only clients that are supposed to get internal private addresses
should be in internal view. "...You mean, that I should to create a
internal and
:50 -0400
> From: br...@wadsworth.org
> To: a...@clegg.com
> Subject: Re: weird perfmonce BIND version 9.6
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>
>
> Alan,
>
> Apreciate the warning, these options are restricted in our
> public/internet facing servers.
>
> The se
Hi Matus thanks for your answer, can you do me a favor? can you tell me
how to looking for that configuration?
only clients that are supposed to get internal private addresses should
be in internal view. "...You mean, that I should to create a internal
and external record in each view? if this
On 25.09.13 14:58, IT Support wrote:
too many times I´ve got advices about to dns testing using dig
command, but I´m still using ping to check what ip address is
answering to me. In this case i´m testing host2.mydomain.com and i´m
getting the private ip address. I´m wondering how to fix this i
Alan,
Apreciate the warning, these options are restricted in our
public/internet facing servers.
The server that had given us grief is in fact internal and only
serves our internal addresses, and belive it or not the issue
revolved around forwarder zones from peer networks that are private
from
On Sep 25, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> In our switch from BIND 8.3.3 to 9.8.2 we failed to add the now
> necessary statements.
>
> recursion yes;
> allow-recursion { any; };
> allow-query { any; };
> allow-query-cache { any; };
>
> I realize your problem may be entirely differ
Hi Chuck, sorry for the mistake.
so i did the dig host2.mydomain.com and this is the result:
host2.mydomain.com @xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4 <<>>host2.mydomain.com @xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 33734
;; flag
Hi--
On Sep 25, 2013, at 12:22 PM, IT Support wrote:
> Hi charles
I'm "Chuck", although I've also answered to worse things than my full name. :-)
> this is what i get from dig
>
> dig host2.mydomain.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4 <<>> ost2.mydomain.com
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got ans
Hi charles this is what i get from dig
dig host2.mydomain.com
; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4 <<>> ost2.mydomain.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 49898
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECT
Matus,
I don't know if its related or not, but today we found that one
of our internal DNS servers was not providing results for clients
withing the domain, results we knew the server had because we could
login into it and query the same information successfully.
In our switch from BIND 8.3.3 to
On 25.09.13 12:58, IT Support wrote:
I´m getting some weird perfomance on BIND version 9.6 I´m running
on debian, I have internal and external view created. there are
records on internal and external views, so the records on external
view some of them are working and others not working.
I´m
13 matches
Mail list logo
