Hi,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 4:44 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Use the correct zone name.
>
> 1.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA
>
> You have the full /24 so you don’t need to use RFC2317 techniques.
Thanks so much. That worked great.
___
Please visit https://lists.i
Use the correct zone name.
1.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA
You have the full /24 so you don’t need to use RFC2317 techniques.
--
Mark Andrews
> On 25 Jan 2021, at 08:04, Alex wrote:
>
> Hi, I have a fedora32 system with bind-9.11.25 and having a problem
> with setting up a reverse zone for a 192.
- Kevin
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark
> Andrews
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 3:55 PM
> To: bind-us...@isc.org
> Subject: Re: rDNS
>
>
> You have the netblock 162.202.233.8
t, and why?
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Andrews
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 3:55 PM
To: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: rDNS
You have th
You have the netblock 162.202.233.80-162.202.233.87 (162.202.233.80/29).
When software performs a reverse lookup it constructs a DNS name
from the address like 80.233.202.162.in-addr.arpa. Now as the
netblock is not a full /24 you either have to create 8 zones, one
for each PTR record, or provid
So if the DNS resolver used is "OK",
then is there a problem with my code for the in-addr.arpa zone
file? . . .rDNS is not working.
On 1/20/2017 10:19 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
On Fr
On 20.01.17 09:57, Ron Wingfield wrote:
I am having difficulty configuring reverse DNS. This has been a problem
for over a year between my server(s) and my ISP, AT&T. Specifically, I
cannot eMail to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g.,
SBCglobal.net, Comcast.net, or AOL
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Ron Wingfield
wrote:
> I am having difficulty configuring reverse DNS. This has been a problem
> for over a year between my server(s) and my ISP, AT&T. Specifically, I
> cannot eMail to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g.,
> SBCglobal.net, Comc
ITC , NetWork & Security Architect & Admin
From: bind-users on behalf of Reindl Harald
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 5:06 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: rDNS
Am 20.01.2017 um 16:57 schrieb Ron Wingfield:
> I am having difficulty conf
Am 20.01.2017 um 16:57 schrieb Ron Wingfield:
I am having difficulty configuring reverse DNS. This has been a problem
for over a year between my server(s) and my ISP, AT&T. Specifically, I
cannot eMail to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g.,
SBCglobal.net, Comcast.net, or AOL
On 4/13/2010 6:42 PM, Jason Davis wrote:
> Hello,
> Is their an easy way to rdns a /20. I can only find examples for a /24
You need to create individual zones for each /24.
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Impr
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
RRsets are unordered. Software and configurations should
be prepared for this. Where ordering is required it is
built into the RR type.
Mark
On 14.07.09 14:02, Bryan Irv
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > RRsets are unordered. Software and configurations should
> > be prepared for this. Where ordering is required it is
> > built into the RR type.
> >
> > Mark
On 14.07.09 14:02, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> I've think I
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <53d706300907081412r191946eeo5c9a66657bf8e...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Bryan
> Irvine writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
>> > Bryan Irvine wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Other than to really annoy me; =A0is there a valid
In message <53d706300907081412r191946eeo5c9a66657bf8e...@mail.gmail.com>, Bryan
Irvine writes:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> > Bryan Irvine wrote:
> >>
> >> Other than to really annoy me; =A0is there a valid reason for rr rDNS?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Once upon a time, BIND spe
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> Bryan Irvine wrote:
>>
>> Other than to really annoy me; is there a valid reason for rr rDNS?
>>
>>
>
> Once upon a time, BIND specifically *disabled* round-robin behavior for
> non-address (A/) record types. PTR RRsets, among other types, w
Bryan Irvine wrote:
Other than to really annoy me; is there a valid reason for rr rDNS?
Once upon a time, BIND specifically *disabled* round-robin behavior for
non-address (A/) record types. PTR RRsets, among other types, were
always given in a "fixed" order.
But, I just tried a quic
On Friday 13 March 2009 03:14 pm, Ben Bridges wrote:
> You can use one $GENERATE statement in each zone to generate all 256
> CNAME records for that zone.
I couldn't remember the name of that statement for the life of me.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services
P.O. Box 52200,
M
> To: Mark Andrews
> Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
> Subject: Re: rDNS for /20
>
> On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:17 pm, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > Just set up each of the /24's which make up the /20.
>
> That's what I thought I had to do. I don't even have
On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:17 pm, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Just set up each of the /24's which make up the /20.
That's what I thought I had to do. I don't even have to assign the rDNS;
I only have to set the nameservers. Do I still need lines for each
individual IP# in each /24? Or is the
On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:23 pm, Doug Barton wrote:
> It would help if you described in more detail what you've tried, and
> what is confusing you.
Haven't tried anything yet; still waiting for the assignment to us. I
was hoping to get a headstart on understanding the job.
> > I'm trying to
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:11 -0800, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> I've read the relevant parts of DNS and Bind over and over again, and
> I'm still going crazy. I've searched this list going back about three
> years. I've googled. Each step confuses me more .
>
> I'm trying to set up a reverse delegati
Jeff Lasman wrote:
> I've read the relevant parts of DNS and Bind over and over again, and
> I'm still going crazy. I've searched this list going back about three
> years. I've googled. Each step confuses me more .
It would help if you described in more detail what you've tried, and
what is c
In message <200903122311.24920.bli...@nobaloney.net>, Jeff Lasman writes:
> I've read the relevant parts of DNS and Bind over and over again, and
> I'm still going crazy. I've searched this list going back about three
> years. I've googled. Each step confuses me more .
>
> I'm trying to set
24 matches
Mail list logo
