,
Guanghua
> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:09:13 +
> Subject: Re: how to modify the cache
> From: sjc...@gmail.com
> To: houguang...@hotmail.com
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>
> On 17 February 2014 01:17, houguanghua wrote:
> > I want to override the IP address of
On 19 February 2014 09:51, houguanghua wrote:
> But if the specified name server is enabled only when normal dns query
> process is down. How to configure the local DNS server? The detailed
> scenario is descibed in below figure:
I'm not sure if that is possible, you either forward or you allow
Feb 2014 09:09:13 +0000
> Subject: Re: how to modify the cache
> From: sjc...@gmail.com
> To: houguang...@hotmail.com
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>
> On 17 February 2014 01:17, houguanghua wrote:
> > I want to override the IP address of NS, for I want to use other authorit
Thanks a lot. It's a good solution.
> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:09:13 +
> Subject: Re: how to modify the cache
> From: sjc...@gmail.com
> To: houguang...@hotmail.com
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>
> On 17 February 2014 01:17, houguanghua wrote:
> > I want
Indeed. Regular "stub" only overrides the parent's delegation NS
records; "static-stub" overrides the apex NS records of the zone as
well. My uses of the words "stub" (which I intended to cover both forms
of "stub"bing) and "published" (which I intended to cover both the
delegating and apex rec
To clarify, it's sometimes necessary to "mix" iterative and recursive
resolution in the same nameserver instance, maybe even the same view.
Oftentimes, there simply is no choice, because the source of the zone
information doesn't make an authoritative nameserver available, only a
forwarder (thu
> Use a "stub" zone if you want to "override" published NSes _without_
> crossing the very-important boundary between iterative and recursive
> resolution.
Actually no - use static-stub (newer versions of BIND) - otherwise the
NS records received from the zone may override the NS that you want to
Bad performance, bad reliability, clandestine IP-over-DNS tunnels
between networks that are supposed to be isolated...
Is that enough?
Understanding the pros and cons of iterative versus recursive resolution
is one of the few things still separating us from the MCSE savages...
On 02/17/2014 11:37 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
Ugh, that mixes apples (recursive resolution) and oranges (iterative
resolution).
Out of curiosity, what bad thing do you think will happen if you mix
these two functions?
Doug
___
Please visit https://li
Ugh, that mixes apples (recursive resolution) and oranges (iterative
resolution).
Use a "stub" zone if you want to "override" published NSes _without_
crossing the very-important boundary between iterative and recursive
resolution.
- Kevin
On 2/17/2014 4:09 AM, Steven Carr wrote:
O
On 17 February 2014 01:17, houguanghua wrote:
> I want to override the IP address of NS, for I want to use other authority
> DNS which isn't registered.
For that you use forwarding. Create a zone statement for the zone in
question and forward the queries to a different name server. You don't
need
John,
I want to override the IP address of NS, for I want to use other authority DNS
which isn't registered.
Regards,
Guanghua
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:28:58 -0500
Subject: Re: how to modify the cache
From: johnm...@brandeis.edu
To: houguang...@hotmail.com
CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
In article ,
Ben Croswell wrote:
> What you say is true, but the OP wasn't clear in who owned the record he
> wanted to override. I assumed it was someone else's or you would just
> change authoritative source that you own.
Of course. But it's still the case that you can configure your own
re
Are you trying to override the IP address locally, or are you just trying
to get the correct value into cache?
John
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:52 AM, houguanghua wrote:
> Hi all,
> Bind provides rndc tools to operate the cache. But how to change a record
> in the cache. For example:
> to modify
What you say is true, but the OP wasn't clear in who owned the record he
wanted to override. I assumed it was someone else's or you would just
change authoritative source that you own.
On Feb 14, 2014 10:20 AM, "Barry Margolin" wrote:
> In article ,
> Ben Croswell wrote:
>
> > You can't modify
In article ,
Ben Croswell wrote:
> You can't modify cache. If that was allowed you could cache poison any
> domain you wanted.
"poisoning" refers to putting incorrect records into the cache of some
*other* server. If you operate the server itself, you can put anything
you want into its memor
You can't modify cache. If that was allowed you could cache poison any
domain you wanted.
On Feb 14, 2014 8:52 AM, "houguanghua" wrote:
> Hi all,
> Bind provides rndc tools to operate the cache. But how to change a record
> in the cache. For example:
> to modify origin record " *www.abc.com*
On 14 February 2014 13:52, houguanghua wrote:
> Who can tell me how to do?Thanks.
You can't and shouldn't need to edit the cache. All you can do is clear it.
If you want to change the response back to the client then look into
RPZ, however by doing so you may break DNSSEC validation and end up
n
18 matches
Mail list logo