Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 02.10.2016 um 23:24 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: On 2016-10-02 22:09, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 02.10.2016 um 22:04 schrieb Maile Halatuituia: how about nslookup with set debug option i think would do besides the fact that when you think "nslookup" is the solution for anything you don't kno

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2016-10-02 22:09, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 02.10.2016 um 22:04 schrieb Maile Halatuituia: >> how about nslookup with set debug option i think would do > > besides the fact that when you think "nslookup" is the solution for > anything you don't know your problem you did not understand m

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Reindl Harald
indl Harald Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 8:34 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: debug SERVFAIL Am 02.10.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: Thank you for all good advices, but I cannot refrain from commenting on the fact that nobody answered my real question, namely, A tip o

RE: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Maile Halatuituia
how about nslookup with set debug option i think would do From: bind-users on behalf of Reindl Harald Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 8:34 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: debug SERVFAIL Am 02.10.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 02.10.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: Thank you for all good advices, but I cannot refrain from commenting on the fact that nobody answered my real question, namely, A tip on how to generate debug output from "dig", in particular when investigating SERVFAIL. In my stupidity I thou

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Hi, On 2016-10-02 20:41, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 02.10.2016 um 20:32 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: >> On 2016-10-02 19:22, Nico CARTRON wrote: >>> Hi Per, >>> On 2 Oct 2016, at 19:07, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: [...] > Just use the "hint" type configuration. This is j

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 02.10.2016 um 20:32 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: On 2016-10-02 19:22, Nico CARTRON wrote: Hi Per, On 2 Oct 2016, at 19:07, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: [...] Just use the "hint" type configuration. This is just fine for most users. The interesting thing is why FreeBSD includes the recom

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Hi, On 2016-10-02 19:22, Nico CARTRON wrote: > Hi Per, > >> On 2 Oct 2016, at 19:07, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> Just use the "hint" type configuration. This is just fine for most users. >> >> The interesting thing is why FreeBSD includes the recommendation in the >> default nam

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Nico CARTRON
Hi Per, > On 2 Oct 2016, at 19:07, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > [...] > >> Just use the "hint" type configuration. This is just fine for most users. > > The interesting thing is why FreeBSD includes the recommendation in the > default named.conf if that is not good, and I thought it would be

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Hi, On 2016-10-02 17:51, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > On 02/10/16 17:22, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > Hello Per, > > Please see my answers below. You appear to have a bad configuration. Well, HAD a bad configuration as I just posted. >> Hmmm, looks like I've found something here. The default named

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 02/10/16 17:22, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: Hello Per, Please see my answers below. You appear to have a bad configuration. > Hmmm, looks like I've found something here. The default named.conf on > FreeBSD has the following section on the root servers. If I comment out > the "traditional" root

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2016-10-02 17:02, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 02.10.2016 um 17:00 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: >> On 2016-10-02 16:50, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 02.10.2016 um 16:46 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: What is the best way to debug a SERVFAIL problem? I have tried to ramp up the tr

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 02.10.2016 um 17:00 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: On 2016-10-02 16:50, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 02.10.2016 um 16:46 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: What is the best way to debug a SERVFAIL problem? I have tried to ramp up the trace level a lot but that did not return anything useful. It is onl

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2016-10-02 16:50, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 02.10.2016 um 16:46 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: >> What is the best way to debug a SERVFAIL problem? I have tried to ramp >> up the trace level a lot but that did not return anything useful. >> >> It is only one zone in question, namely the PTR f

Re: debug SERVFAIL

2016-10-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 02.10.2016 um 16:46 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark: What is the best way to debug a SERVFAIL problem? I have tried to ramp up the trace level a lot but that did not return anything useful. It is only one zone in question, namely the PTR for our external subnet. What puzzles me the most is that