Re: Workaround Solaris's kernel bug

2008-11-22 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:04:39 -0600, "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So is there a version *public release* of Bind9 that we can compile > right out of the box that will work correctly on Solaris 10 (10/08) and if so > which version is it? 9.4.3 and 9.3.6. 9.5.1rc1 which will soon be

Re: Workaround Solaris's kernel bug

2008-11-22 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:58 -0500, "Davenport, Steve M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is the correct procedure to make this define: > > STD_CDEFINES='-DISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH' > export STD_CDEFINES > ./configure > make Correct. But note that not all Solaris users need this workaround. In f

RE: Workaround Solaris's kernel bug

2008-11-20 Thread Davenport, Steve M
Is the correct procedure to make this define: STD_CDEFINES='-DISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH' export STD_CDEFINES ./configure make -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Schulz Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 4:25 PM To: bind-users@lists.i

Re: Workaround Solaris's kernel bug

2008-11-20 Thread J.D. Bronson
At 10:18 AM 11/20/2008 +, you wrote: This is CR 6724237 Which was first introduced in Solaris 8. At this time there is no patch for Solaris 8, 9 or 10 and therefore "ISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH" should be defined when building BIND 9 f

Re: Workaround Solaris's kernel bug

2008-11-20 Thread Stacey Jonathan Marshall
Thomas Schulz wrote: Change 2489 says to define ISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH to workaround a Solaris kernel bug about /dev/poll. How do I know if I should define this? Should I just assume that if I am running Sloaris 8 then I need to define ISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH? Is there any down side to defi

Re: Workaround Solaris's kernel bug

2008-11-19 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:24:47 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Schulz) wrote: > Change 2489 says to define ISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH to workaround a > Solaris kernel bug about /dev/poll. How do I know if I should define > this? Should I just assume that if I am running Sloaris 8 then I need