On 15/05/13 15:58, Tony Finch wrote:
> Tom Sommer wrote:
>>
>> That works fine, but I think I figured out the problem, it was due to
>> the server having acquired a 2nd (autodiscovered) IPv6 address, and it
>> was using that as transfer source. It would be very helpful if the
>> logfile said the a
Tom Sommer wrote:
>
> That works fine, but I think I figured out the problem, it was due to
> the server having acquired a 2nd (autodiscovered) IPv6 address, and it
> was using that as transfer source. It would be very helpful if the
> logfile said the actual source IP, and not just 0.0.0.0#53 or
On 5/9/13 2:19 PM, Luther, Dan wrote:
> Tom,
>
> What happens when you "dig +tcp example.com @1.2.3.4"? Specifically I'm
> wondering here if the slave you're having problems with is blocking TCP port
> 53. Such a configuration would allow you to query the master server, but not
> transfer
Of
Tom Sommer
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 1:16 PM
To: Cathy Almond
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Stalling slave transfers
On 5/8/13 12:25 PM, Cathy Almond wrote:
> On 08/05/13 08:26, Tom Sommer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a problem with one of 3 slave servers, all set
On 5/9/13 11:36 AM, Cathy Almond wrote:
I don't think you solved the problem - I think you moved it (or made it
happen faster...)
The refresh errors indicate that the master isn't responding to your
slave for some reason. That's what you'll need to investigate. I would
suggest auditing the di
On 08/05/13 19:15, Tom Sommer wrote:
>
> On 5/8/13 12:25 PM, Cathy Almond wrote:
>> On 08/05/13 08:26, Tom Sommer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a problem with one of 3 slave servers, all set up the exact same
>>> way, with the exact same bind version and configuration.
>>>
>>> One slave has a prob
On 5/8/13 8:15 PM, Tom Sommer wrote:
Another issue has arisen now though, the logfile is filled with lots of
named[5596]: zone example.com/IN: refresh: failure trying master
1.2.3.4#53 (source 0.0.0.0#0): operation canceled
and
named[5596]: zone example.com/IN: refresh: retry limit for mast
On 5/8/13 12:25 PM, Cathy Almond wrote:
On 08/05/13 08:26, Tom Sommer wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with one of 3 slave servers, all set up the exact same
way, with the exact same bind version and configuration.
One slave has a problem transfering zones from the master.
The logfiles are floode
On 08/05/13 08:26, Tom Sommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with one of 3 slave servers, all set up the exact same
> way, with the exact same bind version and configuration.
>
> One slave has a problem transfering zones from the master.
>
> The logfiles are flooded with "received notify for
9 matches
Mail list logo
