Both servers are broken. One fails to implement DNS COOKIE (RFC 7873)
correctly. Note that the "Client COOKIE mismatch" is reported. Named rejects
the response because the client cookie does not match that sent to the server.
The response looks like someone trying to spoof the response. The o
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:27 AM Stephan von Krawczynski
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I ran across a question I did not really expect. I am using bind 9.14.1 as
> normal, standalone nameserver. When trying to resolve a certain domain I get a
> SERVFAIL (with nslookup). Deeper inspection of the proble
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:36:42 +0100
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On 27/01/2020 16:26, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> Hi Stephan,
>
> > I would have expected that bind finds the domain by using the working
> > nameserver and ignoring the dead one. But obviously it does not.
> > Did I misconfigure
In article ,
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I ran across a question I did not really expect. I am using bind 9.14.1 as
> normal, standalone nameserver. When trying to resolve a certain domain I get a
> SERVFAIL (with nslookup). Deeper inspection of the problem shows that the
>
Hi, Stephan,
If the domain has one working DNS server and one that's broken, but both are
in the delegation, then it's somewhat of random luck as to which one you'll
try first... If you try the bad one first, then what happens next depends on
"how" it's bad. If it's just dead/down, then after a ti
Am 27.01.20 um 16:26 schrieb Stephan von Krawczynski:
> I ran across a question I did not really expect. I am using bind 9.14.1 as
> normal, standalone nameserver. When trying to resolve a certain domain I get a
> SERVFAIL (with nslookup). Deeper inspection of the problem shows that the
> domain
On 27/01/2020 16:26, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Hi Stephan,
> I would have expected that bind finds the domain by using the working
> nameserver and ignoring the dead one. But obviously it does not.
> Did I misconfigure something? I thought both nameservers should be questioned
> and the firs
7 matches
Mail list logo