Hi,
FTR I spent some time today trying to reproduce the issue and I can’t reproduce
it locally,
so it must be something else than just simple number of workers.
The associated issue is here:
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2837
If anybody experiencing the issue was to go thr
垃圾
2021-07-23 11:31 GMT-07:00, Peter via bind-users :
> Well I reported it and we see what happens my main bind is not in a
> virtual machine I guess I cound disbale Hyper-Threading as a workaround...
>
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/list
你們聊天滾到別個地方,給我滾
2021-07-23 11:31 GMT-07:00, Peter via bind-users :
> Well I reported it and we see what happens my main bind is not in a
> virtual machine I guess I cound disbale Hyper-Threading as a workaround...
>
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/
Sorry 滾
2021-07-23 11:31 GMT-07:00, Peter via bind-users :
> Well I reported it and we see what happens my main bind is not in a
> virtual machine I guess I cound disbale Hyper-Threading as a workaround...
>
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman
update on how to get bind to run with parameters for windows
make folder in C:\ named
make file called named.bat
in the bat file add:
sc start named -n 7
in services > ISC BIND recovery tab
first failure select run a program
check enable actions for stops with errors
in run program browse
Yes I went in services and put in start parameters -n 7 and 9.16.19
started however a bug in windows means it does not save the parameter at
least I think it a bug so you have to manually put in -n 7 to start bind.
On 23/07/2021 7:53 pm, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Thanks, having such a simple reprodu
Thanks, having such a simple reproducer is helpful.
Can you try if adding `-n 8` vs `-n 7` have the same effect?
Ondřej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 23. 7. 2
Well I reported it and we see what happens my main bind is not in a
virtual machine I guess I cound disbale Hyper-Threading as a workaround...
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds th
Hi Peter,
I’ve run a few tests based on your observations regarding the number of vCPU
cores and my own findings are that it is specifically 8 vCPUs and 12 vCPUs
which exhibit this behaviour. I haven’t been able to test beyond 12 vCPUs
because that’s my hardware limit.
With 1-7 vCPUs, or with
9 matches
Mail list logo