on.
Thank you very much in advice,
Dmitri.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Ondrej Surý
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 7:48 PM
To: Emmanuel Fusté
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
What Emmanuel said…
--
Ondřej Surý
On 08/08/2022 12:29, Dmitri Pavlov wrote:
Hi Dmitri,
Your response about the KB correctness will help to deliver a better
optimized business decision.
If you're using BIND in your commercial products and making money from
it, you should consider taking out an ISC support contract, so that yo
Thank you very much, Team.
Your feedback is very much appreciated.
Dmitri.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Ondrej Surý
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 7:48 PM
To: Emmanuel Fusté
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
What
What Emmanuel said…
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 4. 8. 2022, at 19:15, Emmanuel Fusté wrote:
>
> Le 04/08/2022 à 17:48, Dmitri Pavlov a écrit
>> Therefore,
Le 04/08/2022 à 17:48, Dmitri Pavlov a écrit
Therefore, a very small request. Would it be possible on your side to run the same
experiment as with (BIND 9.16.32 / BIND 9.18.6 / BIND 9.19.4) one more time but
with BIND 9.16.21 (or any other version in 9.16.x <25 range )?
Why not the opposite ?
rs@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
Well, then I don’t know the reason for the difference in your case. And I don’t
personally see a compelling reason to investigate a 10% increase in artificial
scenario like this since it apparently doesn’t apply to all scenarios. H
day, August 2, 2022 6:30 PM
To: Dmitri Pavlov
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
Well, then I don’t know the reason for the difference in your case. And I don’t
personally see a compelling reason to investigate a 10% increase in artificial
scenario
0c"
Dmitri.
-Original Message-
From: Anand Buddhdev
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 6:42 PM
To: Dmitri Pavlov
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
Dmitri,
Just downloading, building and installing the latest version of jemalloc like
this doe
Dmitri,
Just downloading, building and installing the latest version of jemalloc
like this doesn't mean that BIND will find and use it. BIND has to be
compiled with the correct compiler and linker flags to use this version.
Are you certain BIND is using your installed version?
--
Anand
On 0
gt; From: Dmitri Pavlov
> Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 6:14 PM
> To: Ondřej Surý
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you very much for your feedback, Ondrej.
>
> Sharing the steps. Very simple: configur
eboot -f
Dmitri.
-Original Message-
From: Dmitri Pavlov
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 6:14 PM
To: Ondřej Surý
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
Hi,
Thank you very much for your feedback, Ondrej.
Sharing the steps. Very simple: configure -> m
rom: Ondřej Surý
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 6:20 PM
To: Dmitri Pavlov
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
I don’t see jemalloc anywhere in your setup scripts. Preferably use the latest
upstream jemalloc version available.
Ondřej
--
Ondřej Surý —
ld my steps be to get the expected smaller memory
> footprint. Or maybe there are obvious flaws in the experiment?
>
> Thanking you very much for patience and cooperation,
> Dmitri.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ondřej Surý
> Sent: Monday, August 1,
ject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
$ wc -l gen.db
1 gen.db
generated with:
#!/bin/env python3
for x in range(0, 1):
for y in range(0, 2500):
print(f"az{x}-{y} IN A 10.53.0.1")
print(f"bz{x}-{y} IN A 10.53.0.2")
print(f"
. That is it.
>
> We will test with a higher kernel.
>
> Kind regards,
> Dmitri.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Ondřej Surý
> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 6:46 PM
> To: Dmitri Pavlov
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.
> On 1. 8. 2022, at 20:05, Dmitri Pavlov wrote:
> The records generation part is different though , using shell script
> basically. Unique IPs were linked with unique CNAMEs.
I would need the exact algorithm how did you generate the zones.
BTW using shell for this takes ages. Generating zone
les. That is it.
We will test with a higher kernel.
Kind regards,
Dmitri.
-Original Message-
From: Ondřej Surý
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 6:46 PM
To: Dmitri Pavlov
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
> On 1. 8. 2022, at 17:19, D
$ wc -l gen.db
1 gen.db
generated with:
#!/bin/env python3
for x in range(0, 1):
for y in range(0, 2500):
print(f"az{x}-{y} IN A 10.53.0.1")
print(f"bz{x}-{y} IN A 10.53.0.2")
print(f"ca{x}-{y} IN A 10.53.0.3")
print(f"xh{x}-{y} IN CNAME az{x}-{y}”
> On 1. 8. 2022, at 17:19, Dmitri Pavlov wrote:
>
> I’m pretty much sure you will get the same results in your lab.
I don’t want to delve into vague description of your experiment. You’ll have to
share the exact scripts.
Even this:
> just the time-consuming task is to generate 100 MIL A + CNAM
the experiment is only to measure a memory
footprint of “many” records.
Regards,
Dmitri.
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Dmitri Pavlov
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 6:19 PM
To: Victoria Risk
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org; Ond≈ôej Sur√Ω
Subject: RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
Thank you
--
Best regards
Sten Carlsen
--
Aoccdrnig to rseerach at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy,
it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a
wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the
frist and lsat lteter be at the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a ttoal
out our experiment are required.
Regards,
Dmitri.
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Victoria Risk
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 6:08 PM
To: Doug Whitfield
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org; Ond≈ôej Sur√Ω
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
Hi Doug,
I think Ondrej is referring to this p
Hi Doug,
I think Ondrej is referring to this post from a prior month:
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2022-June/106350.html
….
For tips on how to measure memory usage you might want to look at
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/131303/how-can-i-measure-the-actual-memory-usage-of-an-
> On 1. 8. 2022, at 16:14, Doug Whitfield wrote:
>
> as monitored from "top" RES value
Please read the whole thread on measuring the real consumed memory.
The '“top” RES value' has little or no value at all.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@isc.org
My working hours and your working hours
scenarios it applies to?
Best regards,
Doug Whitfield
From: bind-users on behalf of Petr Špaček
Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 03:16
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
On 26. 07. 22 0:14, Doug Whitfield wrote:
> I wonder if simply adding the w
On 26. 07. 22 0:14, Doug Whitfield wrote:
I wonder if simply adding the words “in most cases” to the end of the
sentence might make it more clear that the 10% increase in memory is not
so much a bug as a different use case.
I'm eager to see reproducer for this +10 % increase but so far it was
There’s no generic tool. The one that was mentioned in the article was tailored
for that specific bug in jemalloc.
In any case, the article is only tangential to the topic here. It talks about a
issue in the jemalloc that was triggered by a specific code in named.
Ondřej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (H
Users
Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
I can’t really parse your message. I’ve repeatedly asked you to provide a
reproducer. And yet again you come and ask that we do the debugging for you.
The currency here that you need to pay to get help is sharing - sharing the
inform
record length also impact the memory used?
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Regards,
>> >>>>> > Raman
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:5
gt;>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Is this the expected behaviour or any more tuning is needed?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > One more thing: does CNAME record length also impact the memory used?
>>>>>&g
:
> >>>>> >
> ---
> >>>>> > Optional features enabled:
> >>>>> > Memory allocator: jemalloc
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
gt;>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2. Then, configure statistics channel in named.conf like this:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > statistics-channels {
>>>>> > inet 127.0.0.1 port 8080;
>>>>> > };
>
;>> Thank you!
> >>> Petr Špaček
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 18. 05. 22 8:56, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote:
> >>>> I remember we had similar issues with 9.18 (isc ppa packages) and hence
> >>> wen't back to 9.
piled with libjemalloc. And the
> > >>> differences are not small, for some configurations it can be even 2x
> or
> > >>> 3x more on 9.16 than it is on 9.18.
> > >>>
> > >>> If you encounter it again please get back to us so we can diagno
configurations it can be even 2x or
> >>> 3x more on 9.16 than it is on 9.18.
> >>>
> >>> If you encounter it again please get back to us so we can diagnose it.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you!
> >>> Petr Špaček
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
us so we can diagnose it.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you!
> >>> Petr Špaček
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 18. 05. 22 8:56, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote:
> >>>> I remember we had similar issues with 9.18 (isc ppa packages) an
ember the details.
regards
Klaus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: bind-users Im Auftrag von
Ondrej
Surý101 71 l t1h, 18. Mai 2022 08:37
An: Raman kumar
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Betreff: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
You did not provided any details, so we can’t really
r issues with 9.18 (isc ppa packages) and hence
>> wen't back to 9.16. But I can not remember the details.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Klaus
>>>
>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>>> Von: bind-users Im Auftrag von
>
Klaus
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>> Von: bind-users Im Auftrag von Ondrej
>>> Surý101 71 l t1h, 18. Mai 2022 08:37
>>> An: Raman kumar
>>> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>>> Betreff: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2
>>&g
Hello,
Please find the details below.
Free command is used to check RAM available/used. space used is 50GB on
RHEL 7.9 in bind version 9.18.2 whereas in bind version 9.16.10 RAM
space used is 44 GB with the same amount of data and configuration.
free -g
totalused
You did not provided any details, so we can’t really help you.
What is “RAM consumption” anyway? VSZ, RSS, numbers pulled from stats channel
from named?
What’s the hardware, what is the configuration, how was BIND 9 compiled (or
packaged)?
The more details, the better
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (H
41 matches
Mail list logo
