RE: CNAME / MX Record question

2011-08-08 Thread Shawn Bakhtiar
sc.org Subject: Re: CNAME / MX Record question On 8/7/2011 9:05 AM, Scott Hughes wrote: All, I have Googled and searched the archives for two days and cannot find an answer to this question... just more confusion! Please forgive me ahead

Re: CNAME / MX Record question

2011-08-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/07/2011 06:05, Scott Hughes wrote: > All, > > I have Googled and searched the archives for two days and cannot find an > answer to this question. http://dougbarton.us/DNS/MX.html -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go

Re: CNAME / MX Record question

2011-08-07 Thread David Miller
On 8/7/2011 9:05 AM, Scott Hughes wrote: All, I have Googled and searched the archives for two days and cannot find an answer to this question... just more confusion! Please forgive me ahead of time as I run two name servers for my mid-sized company and am by no means an expert in using bind

Re: CNAME / MX Record question

2011-08-07 Thread Emil Natan
Using CNAME as MX is not recommended, someone might say forbidden. Check the following thread: https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2009-January/074828.html Technically I think there is no problem to do so, BIND even has an option to ignore such checks - check-mx-cname. BTW you did not specif