Re: Bind-Efficientip

Am 24.10.19 um 00:53 schrieb Mik J: > You won't do it within a night that's for sure add the delegation part for who can show and edit which zones? easily given that the whole backend was written basicly in a single night after the day we decided to move all dns zones from customers to our own

Re: Bind-Efficientip

You won't do it within a night that's for sure.But yes the vendors assemble components with a web interface and database.But now it seems to me that all products add more intelligence. For my own needs bind alone is all fine because I'm root.But for 500+ users that need to view, modify some zon

Re: Bind-Efficientip

Am 24.10.19 um 00:35 schrieb Mik J via bind-users: > Efficient IP uses bind (+ nsd/unbound) as the DNS server. > > One major difference between Efficient IP and bind is when you want to > delegate the zone configuration to users and groups. I think it's called > role based management. > So let's

Re: Bind-Efficientip

Hello, Efficient IP uses bind (+ nsd/unbound) as the DNS server. One major difference between Efficient IP and bind is when you want to delegate the zone configuration to users and groups. I think it's called role based management.So let's say you want team1 to have read/write access to the zone

Re: Bind-Efficientip

We tested Bluecat, Infoblox, Solarwinds and EfficientIP solutions. In the end we went with EfficentIP for our IPAM solution. We don't run their DNS servers but do use their DHCP package on our own servers. When we reviewed the major players EfficientIP had the most versatility in how one could run

Re: Bind-Efficientip

(This post is not related to EfficientIP specifically...) The ratio of security vulnerabilities found by “code inspection” is really low nowadays. I would even say it’s nonexistent. This doesn’t apply only to BIND 9, but also other open source projects. Most of the issues are found by using the

Re: Bind-Efficientip

[ Classification Level: PUBLIC ] It's not clear to me from the marketing fluff whether EfficientIP is based on BIND or not. If it is, then consider that you have an open-source codebase, and the eternal debate is whether open source is inherently more secure or not. On the one side, is the "many

Re: Bind-Efficientip

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:26 PM John W. Blue wrote: > > There is a ton of fluff on the EfficientIP website about carrier grade this > and carrier grade that. So it feels like to me that you are getting trapped > in the marketing goo when you really should be asking if an IPAM solution is > wh

RE: Bind-Efficientip

There is a ton of fluff on the EfficientIP website about carrier grade this and carrier grade that. So it feels like to me that you are getting trapped in the marketing goo when you really should be asking if an IPAM solution is what your organization needs. That said, IPAM software (Infoblo

Re: [EXT] Re: Bind-Efficientip

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 12:25:11PM -0400, Alan Clegg wrote: > On 10/20/2019 2:09 AM, MEjaz wrote: > > > As you know these days there has been several security threats, So > > deciding to go with *Efficient iP DDI and DNS Security Solution* > > https://www.efficientip.com/ > > You may want to a

Re: Bind-Efficientip

On 10/20/2019 2:09 AM, MEjaz wrote: As you know these days there has been several security threats, So deciding to go with *Efficient iP DDI and DNS Security Solution* https://www.efficientip.com/ You may want to ask what EfficientIP runs under the covers... AlanC __

RE: Bind-Efficientip

Hello all, We are an leading ISP CYBERIA (www.cyberia.net.sa ), we are using bind since several years, and 1000 of zones are hosted in it. quite ok. As you know these days there has been several security threats, So deciding to go with Efficient iP D