Is there any specific reason, why don't you use nsupdate to manage
updated dynamic zone within bind9? What are requirements of your
application? Why don't you include just NS, NAPTR and CNAME in existing
zone, where only top level SOA and NS records would be static?
Is speed of changes critical? H
Really, please read the RFCs and don’t try to reverse engineer a DNS server.
You will get it wrong. As a recursive server developer we are sick and tired
of people who do half baked DNS implementations because they failed to take
the time to read the specifications.
Read the errata. Read the upda
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the response. Now NS query is working fine!!
But I have one more query-
we have our application to resolve e164 domain queries i.e NS, NAPTR and CNAME
queries only. If user give any other query type then application sends
RCODE=4(NOT_IMPLEMENTED) in response.
But bind9 is r
3 matches
Mail list logo
