Re: R: R: R: Three RPZ zone definition

Job wrote: > But, if i have two different zones (or three), in the response-policy > sentence, can i trigger the Client only for a zone and not for the other > zone? > Some Client would not have to match together the two zones! I think your question is answered by this part of the documentation

R: R: R: Three RPZ zone definition

sers@lists.isc.org Oggetto: Re: R: R: Three RPZ zone definition Job wrote: > > is there a way to define more response-policy in Bind or the possibility > to apply a response-policy only to certain client ip? There is the RPZ-CLIENT-IP trigger, which applies to any query from a matching cl

Re: R: R: Three RPZ zone definition

Job wrote: > > is there a way to define more response-policy in Bind or the possibility > to apply a response-policy only to certain client ip? There is the RPZ-CLIENT-IP trigger, which applies to any query from a matching client IP address. Or you can use views to apply different RPZ policies to

R: R: Three RPZ zone definition

>>That's how passthru is supposed to work. Hi Tony, is there a way to define more response-policy in Bind or the possibility to apply a response-policy only to certain client ip? Thank you again! Francesco Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode Wight, Portland

Re: R: Three RPZ zone definition

Job wrote: > > i add that, if i have a pass-throu define in second zone > (rpz-dyndns.lan), the third RPZ zone is NOT applied. > > If i have no pass-through in the previous definition, it works! That's how passthru is supposed to work. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr

R: Three RPZ zone definition

Hello, i add that, if i have a pass-throu define in second zone (rpz-dyndns.lan), the third RPZ zone is NOT applied. If i have no pass-through in the previous definition, it works! Thank you, Francesco Da: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [bind-users-bou