Hi Tony,
excellent answer, thank you very much.
My first goal, since i use Bind 9.10 in conjunction with DLZ (old driver), is
limiting additional queries to reduc load into backend database system.
By tuning the minimal-responses i have few database queries less than before;
it is a good step, t
On 23.09.16 09:33, Job wrote:
Very interesting answers, thank you first of all.
Regarding:
BIND 9.11 adds two more stops on the knob
There will be an option to add these stops or, by default, bind-9.11 will care
about this?
care about what?
DNS client will fetch data it needs to resolve a
Very interesting answers, thank you first of all.
Regarding:
>>BIND 9.11 adds two more stops on the knob
There will be an option to add these stops or, by default, bind-9.11 will care
about this?
Thank you
Francesco
Da: bind-users [bind-users-boun...@li
In article ,
Job wrote:
> I thought setting minimal_responses = yes should lower the number of queries
> Do you think it is the opposite?
Yes.
With minimal_response = no, it doesn't fill in the Additional section
with records related to the ones in the Answer section. If the client
doesn't a
minimal-responses affects the size and not the number of responses.
On Sep 22, 2016 23:44, "Job" wrote:
> Hi Matus,
>
> >>If you want to avoid additional queries, turn minimal_responses off.
>
> I thought setting minimal_responses = yes should lower the number of
> queries
> Do you think it is t
Hi Tony,
>>it's a record in the additional section of
the response - specifically the OPT record which includes the EDNS buffer
size, DNSSEC flag, and other extensions
Is there an option to disable completely the OPT record information provided
from Bind?
Thank you!
Francesco
__
Hi Matus,
>>If you want to avoid additional queries, turn minimal_responses off.
I thought setting minimal_responses = yes should lower the number of queries
Do you think it is the opposite?
Thank you again!
Francesco
Da: bind-users [bind-users-boun...@l
7 matches
Mail list logo
