On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 07:58:31AM +0100, Braebaum, Neil wrote:
> I'm happy with the concept of views, and have used them previously.
>
> Ideally, though (as Chris mentioned) I don't want to have to manage zone
> data for the externally used domain, both on my name servers, and those
> where it's
the domain to my internal nameservers.
Neil
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Joseph S D Yao
> Sent: 19 June 2009 02:43
> To: Chris Buxton
> Cc: Braebaum, Neil; bind-us...@isc.org
&
ins looks to be very useful - many
thanks for that.
Neil
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Joseph S D Yao
> Sent: 19 June 2009 02:43
> To: Chris Buxton
> Cc: Braebaum, Neil; bind-us...@
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:12:07PM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
...
> Yes, that will absolutely work. But the OP requested a method that did
> not involve managing the public data in two places.
...
Which is exactly what views are for. External data is kept in ONE file,
as below.
named.conf:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 9:08 AM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:44:38AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
...
Setting aside the DNAME record, what you're trying to accomplish is
something frequently requested - a private overlay on an otherwise
public zone that doesn't obscure the public
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:44:38AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
...
> Setting aside the DNAME record, what you're trying to accomplish is
> something frequently requested - a private overlay on an otherwise
> public zone that doesn't obscure the public zone. But it doesn't work
> the way you wa
On Jun 17, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Braebaum, Neil wrote:
What I was hoping to do was create, or perhaps more correctly, cater
for
a specific and small number of records for example.com. (by
DNAME'ing to
example2.com.) internally, by creating a very simple zone with the
DNAME
to example2.com. - mer
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Buxton [mailto:cbux...@menandmice.com]
> Sent: 16 June 2009 15:40
> To: Braebaum, Neil
> Cc: Bind Mailing
> Subject: Re: Questions about DNAME records
>
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:37 AM, Braebaum, Neil wrote:
> > What I wa
Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:37 AM, Braebaum, Neil wrote:
> Now, ignoring that invalid "www" record, the zone above has an apex
> (example.com itself) and then essentially infinite ghostly children. Any
> valid query that lands in that domain (i.e. the qname ends in
> example.com) bu
On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:37 AM, Braebaum, Neil wrote:
What I was getting at - probably worded poorly - was say I wanted to
provide resolution for something like:-
_service._tcp.example.com.
if I'd previously created the DNAME record (example.com.IN
DNAME example2.com.), would cre
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:37 AM, Braebaum, Neil wrote:
I just have a couple of questions about DNAME records:-
Say I have:-
example.com.IN DNAME example2.com.
If I catered for the names in example2.com. that I want to be able to
use from example.com., would subdomains and
I just have a couple of questions about DNAME records:-
Say I have:-
example.com.IN DNAME example2.com.
If I catered for the names in example2.com. that I want to be able to
use from example.com., would subdomains and resource records be allowed?
And secondly, if the name
12 matches
Mail list logo
