In article ,
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
> >
> > Because the 2nd response also included Authority Section, the additional
> > data are the addresses of the authoritative servers.
> >
>
> Thanks.
> But why the second has an "AUTHORITY SECTION" included? but the first
> doesn't?
It's an op
Because the 2nd response also included Authority Section, the additional
data are the addresses of the authoritative servers.
Thanks.
But why the second has an "AUTHORITY SECTION" included? but the first
doesn't?
Regards.
___
bind-users maili
On 12/30/2010 6:12 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
$ dig www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65353
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, AD
On 12/30/10 11:12, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
$ dig www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65353
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDI
$ dig www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65353
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.cnn.com.
5 matches
Mail list logo