Re: Question about forwarders option access

2016-11-14 Thread Techs-yama
Hi, Steve Thanks for comments! I was mistaken, recheck packet capture results, it was query to all server access in configuration. I thought single server access on first capture results But, I think better to more hight cache hit rate by sequential access(e.g. first access is static). Howev

Re: Question about forwarders option access

2016-11-13 Thread S Carr
On 14 November 2016 at 02:54, Techs-yama wrote: > Does not this configuration parameter [server address] is sequential access? No, it will use both, it will calculate the RTT for both servers and work out which one is responding faster and use that one for the majority of the queries, every so of

Question about forwarders option access

2016-11-13 Thread Techs-yama
Hi, bind-users All. I have question about "global forwarders option" in named.conf, For example, forwarders { 1.1.1.1; 2.2.2.2; }; I tried packet capture in this server on dig query, However, I looked like destination server access is randomized. looked like 1.1.1.1 -> 2.