s
Enterprise IP/DNS Management
Network Infrastructure Tools and Services
From: Evan Hunt
To: Stuart Henderson
Cc: Tony Finch , bind-users@lists.isc.org
Date: 12/09/2014 01:41 PM
Subject:Re: Problem with BIND 9.10.1-P1 recursion limits
Sent by:bind-users-boun...@list
Hi--
On Dec 9, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
> Wanted to point out that (perhaps sadly) this isn't so crazypants...or at
> least not uncommon. The *edge* and *aka* references speak Akamai DNS+CDN.
> From my last overview, this has gotten cleaner in the latest versions of
> th
t;
Subject: Re: Problem with BIND 9.10.1-P1 recursion limits
>On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:51:58PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
>> That's unexpected. I'll see if I can reproduce it.
>
>Okay, I can.
>
>Part of the problem is the somewhat crazypants DNS configuration
>of w
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:51:58PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> That's unexpected. I'll see if I can reproduce it.
Okay, I can.
Part of the problem is the somewhat crazypants DNS configuration
of www.ibm.com:
$ dig +noall +answer www.ibm.com
www.ibm.com.3600IN CNAME www.i
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:46:36PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> It's 5 minutes with 9.10.1-P1 as well.
That's unexpected. I'll see if I can reproduce it.
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
___
Please visit https://lists.
On 2014/12/09 17:37, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:17:52PM +, Tony Finch wrote:
> > Yes, I could reproduce it after flushing my cache. Had to wait five
> > minutes before the queries succeeded, which seems unpleasantly long.
> > I don't know where that time comes from - the ARM
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:17:52PM +, Tony Finch wrote:
> Yes, I could reproduce it after flushing my cache. Had to wait five
> minutes before the queries succeeded, which seems unpleasantly long.
> I don't know where that time comes from - the ARM says the default
> servfail-ttl is 10s.
You'r
Evan Hunt wrote:
>
> However, in this case I think it's because you had an empty cache, and
> sending a second query will clear the problem up. In a future release, we
> may want to lift the restrictions temporarily while priming.
Yes, I could reproduce it after flushing my cache. Had to wait fi
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 02:45:13PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> The new recursion limits (or at least the default values for them) seem
> to have some problems. Simple example, if I start named for recursive
> service, no forwarders, debugging enabled, and run "dig @::1 www.ibm.com a"
> I get a
The new recursion limits (or at least the default values for them) seem
to have some problems. Simple example, if I start named for recursive
service, no forwarders, debugging enabled, and run "dig @::1 www.ibm.com a"
I get a failure with numerous "exceeded max queries" log entries for gtld
servers
10 matches
Mail list logo
