Re: Postgres v MySQL v Berkely backend for BIND

2009-05-05 Thread Chris Dew
Are there performance increases/decreases involved with using a db in place of bind's normal zone files? Is there a sqlite3 backend to bind? Regards, Chris. -- http://www.finalcog.com/ 2009/5/4 David Ford : > I use the DLZ/PG backend and it's rock solid.  I use Ant with a few > modifications

Re: Postgres v MySQL v Berkely backend for BIND

2009-05-04 Thread R Dicaire
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Stephen Carville wrote: > Anyone here have experience or an informed opinion in using a database > backend to BIND? I've been using the pgsql sdb backend for 5+ years, wrote my own php front end to it. Its been solid. -- aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present: http:

Re: Postgres v MySQL v Berkely backend for BIND

2009-05-04 Thread David Ford
I use the DLZ/PG backend and it's rock solid. I use Ant with a few modifications for my front end. Stephen Carville wrote: > I have to bother you all again. > > I was asked Friday afternoon about using a database with the new BIND > servers. To me it seems using MySQL or PostgreSQL is a bit like

Postgres v MySQL v Berkely backend for BIND

2009-05-04 Thread Stephen Carville
I have to bother you all again. I was asked Friday afternoon about using a database with the new BIND servers. To me it seems using MySQL or PostgreSQL is a bit like hunting rabbits with a howitzer though Berkely DB looks like a good fit. I can find patches for all three but no real information