Re: Possible spnego licensing problem

2015-02-02 Thread Tony Finch
Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > That doesn't exactly mean "general public", so does anyone else know > where a license grant to implementors is documented? Section 4 of http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/IETF-TLP-3.htm Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ Cromarty, Forth: Northwest 5 to

Re: Possible spnego licensing problem

2015-02-02 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:07:11PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > The contents of the file are taken (adapted) from here: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4178#page-16 > > IETF has published RFC 3978 about "IETF Rights in Contributions": > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3978 RFC 3978 is obsolet

Re: Possible spnego licensing problem

2015-02-02 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
Hi Israel On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:05:43AM -0500, israel shahak wrote: > The file spnego.asn1 in lib/dns appears to be non-free. It says to > look at RFC 4178 for the full legal notice and RFC 4178 is under a > non-free license. The file spnego.asn1 is also used to generate other > files. The c

Possible spnego licensing problem

2015-02-02 Thread israel shahak
The file spnego.asn1 in lib/dns appears to be non-free. It says to look at RFC 4178 for the full legal notice and RFC 4178 is under a non-free license. The file spnego.asn1 is also used to generate other files. ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailm