RE: PTR zone / VLSM issue

[Top-posting de-swizzled] On Mar 15 2009, Ben Bridges wrote: From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Alan Clegg [...] Charles Lee wrote: I believe its format should be: 96-127.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa The problem I seem to be having is what order the 96-127 should be in, becaus

RE: PTR zone / VLSM issue

Clegg Sent: Sun 3/15/2009 4:55 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: PTR zone / VLSM issue Charles Lee wrote: > I believe its format should be: 96-127.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa > > The problem I seem to be having is what order the 96-127 should be in, > because in normal form

Re: PTR zone / VLSM issue

Charles Lee wrote: > I believe its format should be: 96-127.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa > > The problem I seem to be having is what order the 96-127 should be in, > because in normal format the network is 195.212.51.96-127 (we basically > run address .96 to address .127) > > Can anyone help out wit

PTR zone / VLSM issue

Greetings- I need to run a PTR zone for a network smaller than 24 bit. I believe its format should be: 96-127.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa The problem I seem to be having is what order the 96-127 should be in, because in normal format the network is 195.212.51.96-127 (we basically run address .96