On 07.02.12 14:10, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
Virtualization doesn't reduce use of resources but DOES separate into
what are perceived to be multiple "servers" so I'm not sure what you
mean by "you still have one server".
one machine, one piece of hardware. There's not much to separate there,
unle
I'm not sure why this answer has gone off into the weeds, but running 2
instances on the same host is quite simple.
1. Get 2 different (hopefully sets of v4 and v6) IP addresses, one for
each instance.
2. Set up 2 different chroot environments, one for the authoritative and
one for the resolver. I
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 03:17:45PM +0800, Jeff Peng wrote:
> 于 2012-2-7 15:09, sasa sasa 写道:
> >I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on
> >CentOS, one cache only and another authoritative.
> >Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them
> >or run 2 instances of BI
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 23:09 -0800, sasa sasa wrote:
> Hi,
> I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on CentOS, one cache
> only and another authoritative.
> Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them or run 2
> instances of BIND on the same OS? I mean what is the
rg
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 3:18 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Multiple BIND instances
On 06.02.12 23:09, sasa sasa wrote:
>I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2
In message <1328616138.50948.yahoomail...@web120103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>, sasa
sasa writes:
> On 2/7/2012 11:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >You can even run a single BIND instance with two separate views and that
> >should not affect functionality.
>
> Wouldn't this have mixed (one) cac
On 2/7/2012 11:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
You can even run a single BIND instance with two separate views and that should
not affect functionality.
On 07.02.12 04:02, sasa sasa wrote:
Wouldn't this have mixed (one) caches?
No, unless you use attach-cache directive.
However, the ca
On 2/7/2012 11:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>You can even run a single BIND instance with two separate views and that
>should not affect functionality.
Wouldn't this have mixed (one) caches?
>I suppose you are running 64bit OS, so you can have really huge cache (>4GB)
Yes, it's 64bit.
__
Zitat von sasa sasa :
Hi,
I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on CentOS,
one cache only and another authoritative.
Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them or run 2
instances of BIND on the same OS? I mean what is the best practice
to take advantage o
On 06.02.12 23:09, sasa sasa wrote:
I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on CentOS, one
cache only and another authoritative.
Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them or run 2
instances of BIND on the same OS?
According to what I've heard, virtualization
于 2012-2-7 15:09, sasa sasa 写道:
I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on CentOS, one cache
only and another authoritative.
Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them or run 2 instances
of BIND on the same OS? I mean what is the best practice to take advantage
Hi,
I got a server with 16GB memory, want to install 2 BIND on CentOS, one cache
only and another authoritative.
Is it better to install 2 OS virtually and run BIND in them or run 2 instances
of BIND on the same OS? I mean what is the best practice to take advantage of
the hardware resources wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
