Issam HARRATHI wrote:
> The result i found with resperf, are not OK for me because when i test
> with tcpreplay ( i monitor packet in and packet out, and i dont see any
> problem in CPU or RAM) i found a maximum throughput less (40%) than what i
> found with resperf.
> Your test was on linux or Uni
you try with tcpreplay?
Thanks.
Issam HARRATHI
-Message d'origine-
De : Eivind Olsen [mailto:eiv...@aminor.no]
Envoyé : mercredi 6 avril 2011 15:26
À : HARRATHI Issam Ext OLNC/DPS
Cc : bind-users@lists.isc.org
Objet : Re: Maximum limit of query per second
iharrathi@orange-ftgrou
iharrathi@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> Have some one reach the number 10 qps for example. Of course we
During testing - yes I have reached that number. This was with resperf
utility which by default speeds up towards 10. From the man page:
"By default, resperf will send traffic for 60
Hi,
Is there any limit for bind for handling a big number of qps (query per second).
Have some one reach the number 10 qps for example. Of course we suppose
that i have a very powerfull server, so the problem will not be the materiel,
and do we have to tune BIND (ISC_SOCKET_MAXSOCKET, ISC_S
4 matches
Mail list logo