In message
, TMK writes:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:14 PM, TMK wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:24:17 -0400
> >> From: John Wobus
> >> Subject: Re: Max Cache Objects
> >> To: bind-users
> >> Message-ID: <36280284-5b30-4bc4-8d7
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:14 PM, TMK wrote:
>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:24:17 -0400
>> From: John Wobus
>> Subject: Re: Max Cache Objects
>> To: bind-users
>> Message-ID: <36280284-5b30-4bc4-8d7c-61cb2c1cc...@cornell.edu>
>> Content-Type: text/
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:24:17 -0400
> From: John Wobus
> Subject: Re: Max Cache Objects
> To: bind-users
> Message-ID: <36280284-5b30-4bc4-8d7c-61cb2c1cc...@cornell.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Is it possible t
Is it possible that your DNS performance issue isn't a
cache issue? For example, does your system need to
invoke bind with -4?
John
On Sep 21, 2011, at 5:00 PM, TMK wrote:
I have couple of questions.
bind cache memory limit is 4GB. can I increase it. or this is hard-
coded limit.
i'm runni
On 9/21/2011 5:00 PM, TMK wrote:
I have couple of questions.
bind cache memory limit is 4GB. can I increase it. or this is hard-coded limit.
i'm running the x64 bit version.
You can _try_ to raise that limit above 4Gb (see the various
configuration elements under "Operating System Resource Lim
I have couple of questions.
bind cache memory limit is 4GB. can I increase it. or this is hard-coded limit.
i'm running the x64 bit version.
also to increase the cache hit ratio I have created script to query my
dns for the top 1 million sites. would this give any performance
advantages or is it
6 matches
Mail list logo