Again unicast could be any IP address or normal IP address given on server?
There is no such specification like multicast
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Blason R wrote:
> Thanks I got it, Below link helped me understand.
>
> https://deepthought.isc.org/article/AA-00518/0/How-can-I-
> synchroniz
Thanks I got it, Below link helped me understand.
https://deepthought.isc.org/article/AA-00518/0/How-can-I-synchronize-DNS-RPZ-firewall-policies-across-multiple-DNS-servers.html
The one thing I didnt understand is how to assign unicast address from DNS
perspective?
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 7:36 PM
Hi there,
Can someone please guide me on working configuration of Mater/Slave zone in
DNS RPZ for reference?
Is that available with someone? And does it work exactly as master/slave
like any other zone?
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/lis
On 3/9/12 7:58 AM, "Romgo" wrote:
> Even if I use a VIP I can reproduce the issue :
> If the first VIP (so the nameserver 1) is down, I'll have the same
> drawbacks. As the resolver will timeout before falling back to the second
> nameserver.
Sure, we don't live in a perfect world. You can estab
Hello,
I know that I can use VIP with any software (corosync, Linux HA...) But
this will not explain the origin of the issue I am facing :)
Even if I use a VIP I can reproduce the issue :
If the first VIP (so the nameserver 1) is down, I'll have the same
drawbacks. As the resolver will timeout b
On 03/08/2012 06:26 PM, michoski wrote:
Meant to add one thing... In our configuration, we actually have two
recursive VIPs per site, and even considered three (internal IPs are cheap).
We do this.
We also make the two different VIPs use different underlying tech - one
is an anycast route a
In article ,
michoski wrote:
> On 3/8/12 8:15 AM, "Romgo" wrote:
> > I can use a VIP for DNS server, but I though that master/slave
> > configuration was made in order to avoid to use a VIP.
>
> Master/slave was to avoid SPOF -- if the master dies, who cares
On 3/8/12 10:20 AM, "Mike Hoskins" wrote:
> On 3/8/12 8:15 AM, "Romgo" wrote:
>> I can use a VIP for DNS server, but I though that master/slave
>> configuration was made in order to avoid to use a VIP.
>
> Master/slave was to avoid SPOF -- if the m
On 3/8/12 8:15 AM, "Romgo" wrote:
> I can use a VIP for DNS server, but I though that master/slave
> configuration was made in order to avoid to use a VIP.
Master/slave was to avoid SPOF -- if the master dies, who cares with a
reasonable expire time. :-)
So go ahead, setup a
: windows XP :/
The default Windows timeout is 2s.
I can see in bind's logs the dns request, but the webpage is not showing
up.
I can use a VIP for DNS server, but I though that master/slave
configuration was made in order to avoid to use a VIP.
Did you guys encounter that kind of issues ?
On 8 Mar 2012, at 02:58, Lyle Giese wrote (on bind-users):
> On linux boxes, adding
>
> options rotate
>
> to the /etc/resolv.conf helps.
[cross-posted, reply-to header set]
Is there a DHCP option which expresses that, and which
typical fielded DHCP clients will respe
On linux boxes, adding
options rotate
to the /etc/resolv.conf helps.
Lyle Giese
LCR Computer Services, Inc.
On 03/07/12 06:54, Bostjan Skufca wrote:
Problem is, most of client resolvers (not resolving nameservers, but
resolvers on workstations etc) query first specified nameserver first,
the
On 3/7/12 9:15 AM, "Barry Margolin" wrote:
> In article ,
> ro...@free.fr wrote:
>> I use bind on my network as DNS Server. Running bind
>> 1:9.6.ESV.R4+dfsg-0+lenny4
>> on Debian Lenny.
>>
>> The setup is quite usual : one master server with one slave server.
>>
>> The slave sync the zone from
In article ,
ro...@free.fr wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I use bind on my network as DNS Server. Running bind
> 1:9.6.ESV.R4+dfsg-0+lenny4
> on Debian Lenny.
>
> The setup is quite usual : one master server with one slave server.
>
> The slave sync the zone from the master.
>
> I discover tha
Problem is, most of client resolvers (not resolving nameservers, but
resolvers on workstations etc) query first specified nameserver first, then
after timeout start with the others. You should create a HA IP for such
uses.
b.
On 7 March 2012 10:23, wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I use bind on my
Dear community,
I use bind on my network as DNS Server. Running bind 1:9.6.ESV.R4+dfsg-0+lenny4
on Debian Lenny.
The setup is quite usual : one master server with one slave server.
The slave sync the zone from the master.
I discover that when the master is down I have some trouble to access to
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Sajeev Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> I have a question regarding configuration of DNSSEC. If I intend to sign a
> particular zone which has master and a slave, would I have to sign both?
No.
Assuming you've correctly setup zone xfers from master to slave, the
actual zone
Hi all,
I have a question regarding configuration of DNSSEC. If I intend to sign a
particular zone which has master and a slave, would I have to sign both?
If yes , how would I accomplish this? Will I have to sign both the master
and the slave zone with the same set of keys (public and priv
18 matches
Mail list logo
