Re: Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-19 Thread @lbutlr
On 19 Oct 2020, at 08:57, Bob McDonald wrote: > When you talk about "putting the .jnl file aside" what are you doing? > Stopping named THEN deleting the .jnl file? I did not delete the file. I stopped named and moved the file, then restarted named. After everything seemed to be working, then I

Re: Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-19 Thread Bob McDonald
When you talk about "putting the .jnl file aside" what are you doing? Stopping named THEN deleting the .jnl file? Using rndc sync -clean ? In the case of the rndc command, you don't need to cycle named. What user is named running as? Are the directory permissions for the directory housing the .jn

Re: Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-19 Thread @lbutlr
On 19 Oct 2020, at 00:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 18.10.20 11:00, @lbutlr wrote: >> I am getting the following error on one specific domain and I am unsure how >> to fi it. Searching for the error lead to suggestions about not running >> multiple copies of bind on the same machine, bu

Re: Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-18 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 18.10.20 11:00, @lbutlr wrote: I am getting the following error on one specific domain and I am unsure how to fi it. Searching for the error lead to suggestions about not running multiple copies of bind on the same machine, but that is not the case here (and it is only affecting one domain)

Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-18 Thread @lbutlr
I am getting the following error on one specific domain and I am unsure how to fi it. Searching for the error lead to suggestions about not running multiple copies of bind on the same machine, but that is not the case here (and it is only affecting one domain). named[652] malformed transaction: