-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 13:27 +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> Since both workarounds are just temporary from our point of view, we
> would like you to really consider finishing the work so DHCP can be
> built against BIND 9.10.
Perhaps redhat.com could fund
On 02/19/2015 07:30 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
>> dhcp is only expected to work with the "generic library" (and also
>> disabling epoll), but this comment now seems to be obsolete as there's
>> no "generic" (formerly called "export") version of the library.
>> Assuming the issue with epoll is somehow res
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:20:29 +0100,
Jiri Popelka wrote:
> But it's still not possible to stop them, one has to use 'kill -9'.
> Any ideas ?
Hmm, that's beyond my experiments. (Do you mean you cannot terminate
them by SIGTERM?) Hopefully someone else has a clue.
--
JINMEI, Tatuya
_
> dhcp is only expected to work with the "generic library" (and also
> disabling epoll), but this comment now seems to be obsolete as there's
> no "generic" (formerly called "export") version of the library.
> Assuming the issue with epoll is somehow resolved, I suspect we'd need
> some run-time me
On 02/19/2015 06:40 PM, 神明達哉 wrote:
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:17:13 +0100,
Tomas Hozza wrote:
We have been linking DHCP against separately built BIND in the past and
everything
worked for years. Only thing that changed is that we updated latest BIND
9.9 to latest 9.10.
Ah, I realized I was pro
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:17:13 +0100,
Tomas Hozza wrote:
> We have been linking DHCP against separately built BIND in the past and
> everything
> worked for years. Only thing that changed is that we updated latest BIND
> 9.9 to latest 9.10.
Ah, I realized I was probably not clear enough about one
Thank you for your reply.
On 02/19/2015 06:01 PM, 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:26:19 +0100,
> Tomas Hozza wrote:
>
> > There's [1] a packaging policy on Fedora,
> > that packages can't be shipped with bundled libraries,
> > which is a case of BIND bundled in DHCP tarball.
> > We'd like to
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:26:19 +0100,
Tomas Hozza wrote:
> There's [1] a packaging policy on Fedora,
> that packages can't be shipped with bundled libraries,
> which is a case of BIND bundled in DHCP tarball.
> We'd like to ship bind-9.10.2 & dhcp-4.3.2 with next Fedora release (22).
> Problem is,
Hi all.
There's [1] a packaging policy on Fedora,
that packages can't be shipped with bundled libraries,
which is a case of BIND bundled in DHCP tarball.
We'd like to ship bind-9.10.2 & dhcp-4.3.2 with next Fedora release (22).
Problem is, that dhclient/dhcpd don't play well with bind-9.10.
Jiri P
9 matches
Mail list logo