I would have to back port right now, and I have a work around that
will work until the we bump our fleet to a newer version. I was mostly
concerned about whether it was something in our network causing the
problem.
Thanks for all the help guys,
--Matt
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Spain, Dr. J
> It's because a few load balancer vendors don't read freely available
> specifications but instead appear to reverse engineer the protocol and get it
> wrong.
> BIND 9.7.0 fixed a long standing of accepting glue promoted to answer by
> parent nameservers. Once we did that there was no need to
In message
, Matt Doughty writes:
> It seems like multiple things are wrong, but I'm still trying to
> understand what part of the breakage is causing Bind to throw out the
> response with the formerr 'invalid response'. Is this broken for
> everyone using bind 9.7 or later? I can just forward
It seems like multiple things are wrong, but I'm still trying to
understand what part of the breakage is causing Bind to throw out the
response with the formerr 'invalid response'. Is this broken for
everyone using bind 9.7 or later? I can just forward this zone to
HonestDNS, which happily serves
On 2/8/2012 10:32 PM, Matt Doughty wrote:
I have spend the afternoon trying to figure this out. The response I
get back from their nameserver looks fine to me, and dig +trace works
fine, but a regular dig returns a servfail. I have looked at the code
for invalid response, but I don't quite follow
Microsoft's servers are broken. "aa" should be set but it isn't.
Mark
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3-P3 <<>> winqual.partners.extranet.microsoft.com
@dns10.one.microsoft.com +norec
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24074
;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANS
I have spend the afternoon trying to figure this out. The response I
get back from their nameserver looks fine to me, and dig +trace works
fine, but a regular dig returns a servfail. I have looked at the code
for invalid response, but I don't quite follow what is going on there,
and the comment 're
7 matches
Mail list logo