Re: Fwd: SSHFP observation

2019-01-31 Thread Alan Clegg
On 1/31/19 10:56 AM, Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote: > est1.ramesh-sshfp.com. 86400   IN  SSHFP 1 1 aa > test2.ramesh-sshfp.com. 86400   IN  SSHFP 1 1 00 When I use these exact lines (with the "aa" and "00"), I get just what he did. When I use lines with correct SSHFP values, they work fine:

Re: Fwd: SSHFP observation

2019-01-31 Thread Jim Popovitch via bind-users
On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 21:12 +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:30:30AM -0500, Jim Popovitch via bind- > users wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 19:14 +0530, rams wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I have setup sshfp records as follows in bind zone file: > > > > > > test1.ramesh-sshfp.c

Re: Fwd: SSHFP observation

2019-01-31 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:30:30AM -0500, Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote: > On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 19:14 +0530, rams wrote: > > Hi, > > I have setup sshfp records as follows in bind zone file: > > > > test1.ramesh-sshfp.com. 86400   IN  SSHFP 1 1 aa > > test2.ramesh-sshfp.com. 86400   IN  SSHFP

Re: Fwd: SSHFP observation

2019-01-31 Thread Jim Popovitch via bind-users
On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 19:14 +0530, rams wrote: > Hi, > I have setup sshfp records as follows in bind zone file: > > test1.ramesh-sshfp.com. 86400   IN  SSHFP 1 1 aa > test2.ramesh-sshfp.com. 86400   IN  SSHFP 1 1 00 > > Successfully started bind but when queried for domain test1 and test2 > , ret

Fwd: SSHFP observation

2019-01-31 Thread rams
Hi, I have setup sshfp records as follows in bind zone file: test1.ramesh-sshfp.com. 86400 IN SSHFP 1 1 aa test2.ramesh-sshfp.com. 86400 IN SSHFP 1 1 00 Successfully started bind but when queried for domain test1 and test2 , returning malformed error and no answer. If fingerprint value wron