On 02.12.12 18:10, Paul Romano wrote:
Thanks for the correction on the term TTL instead of timer. The engineer I
inherited this environment from has the refresh set to 40 minutes and the
zone expiration set to 2 hours. The explanation I got was that since we
are authoritative for AD we want ens
On Dec 2, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Paul Romano wrote:
> Chris.
> Thanks for the correction on the term TTL instead of timer. The engineer I
> inherited this environment from has the refresh set to 40 minutes and the
> zone expiration set to 2 hours. The explanation I got was that since we are
> author
: Chris Buxton
To: Paul Romano
Cc: "bind-us...@isc.org"
Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: Expiration TTLs
On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Paul Romano wrote:
> What is a good compromise on zone expiration TTLs? Our DNS is authoritative
> for AD DNS and we w
On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Paul Romano wrote:
> What is a good compromise on zone expiration TTLs? Our DNS is authoritative
> for AD DNS and we want to make sure we force records to refresh but do not
> want to expose ourselves to the risk of zone failures.
The zone expiration tim
Zuber
To: Paul Romano
Cc: "bind-us...@isc.org"
Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2012 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: Expiration TTLs
We go with 1 hour.
--Wes
On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Paul Romano wrote:
What is a good compromise on zone expiration TTLs? Our DNS is authoritative
for AD DNS a
What is a good compromise on zone expiration TTLs? Our DNS is authoritative
for AD DNS and we want to make sure we force records to refresh but do not want
to expose ourselves to the risk of zone failures.
Thanks
Paul___
Please visit https
6 matches
Mail list logo