Hey Kai,
> If I do a nslookup for one of the otto.de domains I reveive "** server
> can't find somehost.ov.otto.de: SERVFAIL"
The guideline behind the response-policy is that only an actual response gets
rewritten.
This is usually an answer from a recursive lookup.
If you don't get an answer, th
Hi List,
I setup a response-policy zone to override some Records from external
DNS-Servers I can't control.
My db.rpz Zonefile:
$TTL 4H
@ IN SOA localhost. kai.mydomain.com. (
2018012212 ; serial
5M ; refres
On 22/11/2017 14:12, Ron Wingfield wrote:
> . . .well, I've received a lot of comment from several people, _most
> quite helpful and appreciated_; . . .some rather critical and
> condescending. Regardless, I'll just pursue this resolve while using
> other resources . (BTW, under consideration, "
Am 22.11.2017 um 15:02 schrieb Ray Bellis:
On 21/11/2017 17:30, Reindl Harald wrote:
because of https://www.iana.org/help/nameserver-requirements and he
should not have allowed this setup at all because "Minimum number of
name servers - There must be at least two NS records listed in a
delega
On 21/11/2017 17:30, Reindl Harald wrote:
> because of https://www.iana.org/help/nameserver-requirements and he
> should not have allowed this setup at all because "Minimum number of
> name servers - There must be at least two NS records listed in a
> delegation, and the hosts must not resolve to
Does the lone DNS server even respond on the local network? Do you see
DNS traffic flowing to that server?
Time for the divide and conquer method of troubleshooting to find where
the failure is occurring.
Good luck.
Confidentiality Notice:
This electronic message and any attachments may c
Am 21.11.2017 um 18:05 schrieb Ron Wingfield:
. . .well, I never expected to get "flamed" as by GED, "/As a general
observation, not knowing what you're doing is dangerous
on the Internet. Please take some time out of your undoubtedly busy
life to try to ensure that you aren't a menace to the
Am 21.11.2017 um 14:42 schrieb G.W. Haywood via bind-users:
The address for localhost (127.0.0.1) should be in /etc/hosts,
not in your zone file, and very probably it already is
On 21.11.17 15:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
that part is not true
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1537 says:
Note that a
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> interesting - but however "administrators often mistakenly drop the trailing
> dot" is nonsense
Yeah that's irrelevant, but it doesn't change the conclusion that
localhost entries in zones are harmful and unnecessary.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I
Am 21.11.2017 um 15:27 schrieb Tony Finch:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.11.2017 um 14:42 schrieb G.W. Haywood via bind-users:
The address for localhost (127.0.0.1) should be in /etc/hosts,
not in your zone file, and very probably it already is
that part is not true
https://tools.ietf.org/ht
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 21.11.2017 um 14:42 schrieb G.W. Haywood via bind-users:
> > The address for localhost (127.0.0.1) should be in /etc/hosts,
> > not in your zone file, and very probably it already is
>
> that part is not true
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1537 says:
> Note that all d
Am 21.11.2017 um 14:42 schrieb G.W. Haywood via bind-users:
The address for localhost (127.0.0.1) should be in /etc/hosts,
not in your zone file, and very probably it already is
that part is not true
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1537 says:
Note that all domains that contain hosts should ha
Hi there,
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Ron Wingfield wrote:
... our registered domain, archaxis.net, is not resolving ...
As has been mentioned, you don't have a nameserver listening on IP
162.202.233.81. At a guess, you need to restart it.
We run BIND version 9.10.2 ...
Upgrade. See for exampl
Am 21.11.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Mark Andrews:
And the point of require multiple nameservers is to provide redundancy. There
is no redundancy when both servers have the same address.
https://www.iana.org/help/nameserver-requirements
Network diversity
The name servers must be in at least two
And the point of require multiple nameservers is to provide redundancy. There
is no redundancy when both servers have the same address.
[rock:~/git/tld-report] marka% ping 162.202.233.81
PING 162.202.233.81 (162.202.233.81): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 162.202.233.81: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=520.
Ron Wingfield wrote:
> ns1 IN A 162.202.233.81
> ns2 IN A 162.202.233.81
This address isn't responding to DNS queries.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode
Sole, Lundy, Fastnet, Irish Sea: S
Resolution of our registered domain, archaxis.net, is not resolving . .
.cannot be found. This has worked for past months until 3 NOV 2017, when
it started failing. Additionally, the email server, Sendmail, has stopped
receiving email, and cannot send mail to a DNS-aware MTA such as
sbcglobal.net
17 matches
Mail list logo
