(Resending it here, didn't mean to reply just to you Alan)
> On 1/6/2011 3:38 AM, Eivind Olsen wrote:
>> (Yes, I know it's best practice to combine the authoritative + recursive
>> functionality)
> [...] it's NOT best [...]
Yep, I knew that. Embarassing of me to miss that slightly important
"NOT"
On 1/6/2011 3:38 AM, Eivind Olsen wrote:
> I seem to remember seeing something about DNSSEC validation not working
> when a BIND server is used both to serve the DNSSEC signed zone
> authoritatively, and as a resolver? Unfortunately, I haven't managed to
> find this information again, and now I'm
match-recursive is your friend.
In message , "Eivi
nd Olsen" writes:
> Hello.
>
> I seem to remember seeing something about DNSSEC validation not working
> when a BIND server is used both to serve the DNSSEC signed zone
> authoritatively, and as a resolver? Unfortunately, I haven't manag
Hello,
> I seem to remember seeing something about DNSSEC validation not working
> when a BIND server is used both to serve the DNSSEC signed zone
> authoritatively, and as a resolver? Unfortunately, I haven't managed to
> find this information again, and now I'm wondering if it was all in my
> he
Hello.
I seem to remember seeing something about DNSSEC validation not working
when a BIND server is used both to serve the DNSSEC signed zone
authoritatively, and as a resolver? Unfortunately, I haven't managed to
find this information again, and now I'm wondering if it was all in my
head.
(Yes,
5 matches
Mail list logo