2011/8/9 Chris Buxton :
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 10:07 AM, John Williams wrote:
>
>> --- On Tue, 8/9/11, Chris Buxton wrote:
>>
>>> With a private version of a domain, you should not need to
>>> worry about a DS record in the parent. Just make sure your
>>> internal caching servers not only can find t
ginal Message-
From: John Williams [mailto:john.1...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 09 August 2011 06:13 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: DNSSEC and MS AD
My company (as many) run Microsoft Active Directory internally and we use
BIND for our Internet DNS presence. We have had our domain singed for
In message <37eb0c69-09a1-45a8-9d0e-1027ccbf8...@gmail.com>, Chris Buxton write
s:
> The use of internal, private namespace should be entirely transparent to any
> service other than DNS. Your mail server should not need to know about it, an
> d should not be able to detect it (other than watchin
On Aug 9, 2011, at 10:07 AM, John Williams wrote:
> --- On Tue, 8/9/11, Chris Buxton wrote:
>
>> With a private version of a domain, you should not need to
>> worry about a DS record in the parent. Just make sure your
>> internal caching servers not only can find the internal
>> version of your
--- On Tue, 8/9/11, Chris Buxton wrote:
> From: Chris Buxton
> Subject: Re: DNSSEC and MS AD
> To: "John Williams"
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Date: Tuesday, August 9, 2011, 5:00 PM
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 9:13 AM, John
> Williams wrote:
>
> > M
On Aug 9, 2011, at 9:13 AM, John Williams wrote:
> My company (as many) run Microsoft Active Directory internally and we use
> BIND for our Internet DNS presence. We have had our domain singed for some
> time. Now I've been tasked to look into Signing our AD implementation. MS
> has their ow
My company (as many) run Microsoft Active Directory internally and we use BIND
for our Internet DNS presence. We have had our domain singed for some time.
Now I've been tasked to look into Signing our AD implementation. MS has their
own version of DNSSEC for their DNS but my question is would
7 matches
Mail list logo
