Re: Cached negative responses

2018-12-21 Thread Chris Thompson
On Dec 20 2018, Marc Richter wrote: When checking the BIND XML statistics I see the following in the "Cache DB RRsets" section, which I think could be the reason for the high memory usage: ! 18446744073709551559 !A6 18446744073709551607 Is this an overflow on the counter for these ne

Cached negative responses

2018-12-20 Thread Marc Richter
Hi ! I am investigating the memory usage on a BIND 9.9 instance. Yes, I know I should update to 9.11 or 9.12, but the situation there will probably not be a lot different. When checking the BIND XML statistics I see the following in the "Cache DB RRsets" section, which I think could be the reas