Re: CVE-2013-3919 [was Re: resolver.c:4858: fatal error]

2013-06-04 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <3fc34ff5-e0be-4a64-a2fb-dce6025e4...@kumari.net>, Warren Kumari wri tes: > Can you / ISC confirm that authoritative only (recursion no) are not affected > ? > > The implication from the advisory is that they are not, but explicit confirma > tion would be nice... > > Warren Kumari >

Re: CVE-2013-3919 [was Re: resolver.c:4858: fatal error]

2013-06-04 Thread Warren Kumari
Can you / ISC confirm that authoritative only (recursion no) are not affected? The implication from the advisory is that they are not, but explicit confirmation would be nice... Warren Kumari -- Please excuse typing, etc -- This was sent from a device with a tiny keyboard. On Jun 4, 2013,

CVE-2013-3919 [was Re: resolver.c:4858: fatal error]

2013-06-04 Thread Michael McNally
On 6/4/13 1:06 AM, Stas Pirogov wrote: Hello, since upgrading our binds to 9.9.3 (from 9.9.2-P2) I've got following crash couple of times in last 3 days: 04-Jun-2013 08:33:09.531 general: critical: resolver.c:4858: fatal error: 04-Jun-2013 08:33:09.531 general: critical: RUNTIME_CHECK(tresult =