Re: CNAME without recursion

2008-12-03 Thread Barry Margolin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pavel Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have two local domains on our 9.3.4 BIND. One domain has CNAME record > pointing to the record in the second one. The server has recursion disabled. > > What is an expected behavior? I can see this: > > www.

Re: CNAME without recursion

2008-11-21 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pavel Urban writes: > Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pavel Urban writes: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have two local domains on our 9.3.4 BIND. One domain has CNAME record > >> pointing to the record in the second one. The server has recursion d

Re: CNAME without recursion

2008-11-21 Thread Pavel Urban
Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pavel Urban writes: >> Hello, >> >> I have two local domains on our 9.3.4 BIND. One domain has CNAME record >> pointing to the record in the second one. The server has recursion disabled. >> >> What is an expected behavior? I can see this: > >

Re: CNAME without recursion

2008-11-21 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pavel Urban writes: > Hello, > > I have two local domains on our 9.3.4 BIND. One domain has CNAME record > pointing to the record in the second one. The server has recursion disabled. > > What is an expected behavior? I can see this: No. You don't see "

CNAME without recursion

2008-11-21 Thread Pavel Urban
Hello, I have two local domains on our 9.3.4 BIND. One domain has CNAME record pointing to the record in the second one. The server has recursion disabled. What is an expected behavior? I can see this: www.dom1.cz ns.xxx.cz Using domain server: Name: ns.xxx.cz Address: 80.188.xx.xxx#53 Aliase