Re: Bind to INADDR_ANY

2012-01-10 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4f0cebb5.3040...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes: > On 01/10/2012 17:34, Mark K. Pettit wrote: > > There are some caveats to trying to use "interface-interval" to pick up new > IPs. If your BIND drops privileges (e.g., by using the "-u" command-line op > tion to named), you might

Re: Bind to INADDR_ANY

2012-01-10 Thread Mark K. Pettit
On Jan 10, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/10/2012 17:34, Mark K. Pettit wrote: >> In my environment (FreeBSD) we've worked around this problem (just recently, >> in fact), and I can provide more details if there's any interest. > > well I'm definitely interested. :) The short answ

Re: Bind to INADDR_ANY

2012-01-10 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/10/2012 18:38, Mark K. Pettit wrote: > On Jan 10, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 01/10/2012 17:34, Mark K. Pettit wrote: >>> In my environment (FreeBSD) we've worked around this problem (just >>> recently, in fact), and I can provide more details if there's any interest. >> >>

Re: Bind to INADDR_ANY

2012-01-10 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/10/2012 17:34, Mark K. Pettit wrote: > There are some caveats to trying to use "interface-interval" to pick up new > IPs. If your BIND drops privileges (e.g., by using the "-u" command-line > option to named), you might have a problem getting BIND to bind() to the new > IP addresses. > >

Re: Bind to INADDR_ANY

2012-01-10 Thread Mark K. Pettit
There are some caveats to trying to use "interface-interval" to pick up new IPs. If your BIND drops privileges (e.g., by using the "-u" command-line option to named), you might have a problem getting BIND to bind() to the new IP addresses. For example, on FreeBSD if you use "-u" to drop privil

Re: Bind to INADDR_ANY

2012-01-10 Thread michoski
On 1/9/12 5:12 PM, "Bostjan Skufca" wrote: > is binding to all interfaces at once already supported in bind9? I know named > binds to each at-the-moment-available IP address but in HA environment with > virtual interfaces a "rndc reload" is necessary for named to pick up a new > interface, which l

Re: Bind to INADDR_ANY

2012-01-10 Thread Phil Mayers
On 01/10/2012 01:12 AM, Bostjan Skufca wrote: Hi everyone, is binding to all interfaces at once already supported in bind9? I know named binds to each at-the-moment-available IP address but in HA environment with virtual interfaces a "rndc reload" is necessary for named to pick up a new interfac

Bind to INADDR_ANY

2012-01-09 Thread Bostjan Skufca
Hi everyone, is binding to all interfaces at once already supported in bind9? I know named binds to each at-the-moment-available IP address but in HA environment with virtual interfaces a "rndc reload" is necessary for named to pick up a new interface, which leaves a bit of a window of unavailable