Re: Bind 9.9.2 ADB Question Update

2012-11-15 Thread Cathy Almond
On 15/11/12 16:17, Cathy Almond wrote: > On 15/11/12 15:49, Manson, John wrote: >> The adb grow-names process? does not appear to be related to recursive cache >> as I cleared cache while monitoring syslog and the counter kept increasing. >> However a reload did start the adb grow-names process an

Re: Bind 9.9.2 ADB Question Update

2012-11-15 Thread Cathy Almond
On 15/11/12 15:49, Manson, John wrote: > The adb grow-names process? does not appear to be related to recursive cache > as I cleared cache while monitoring syslog and the counter kept increasing. > However a reload did start the adb grow-names process anew. > Both shown below > > . > . > . > Nov

Bind 9.9.2 ADB Question Update

2012-11-15 Thread Manson, John
The adb grow-names process? does not appear to be related to recursive cache as I cleared cache while monitoring syslog and the counter kept increasing. However a reload did start the adb grow-names process anew. Both shown below . . . Nov 14 15:25:40 local@mercury named[2920]: [ID 873579 daemon.