Hello Bruce.
Since this version is exactly the same piece what I am working on for
RHEL, what would be advantage of using Oracle Linux for it?
The same version would land to CentOS Stream and into Red Hat Enterprise
Linux later. We try hard to make no regressions on any update. ISC's
maintained t
Hear, hear, please stay on topic. And the topic here is BIND 9, not a personal
choice of operating system or particular distribution. Particularly, I believe
it would be better to avoid discussing CentOS at this particular time.
That said, we at ISC will do the best to support any choice of oper
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 4:35 AM Tom J. Marcoen
wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Just wondering here, why switching from CentOS to Debian or building BIND
> from sources? What is wrong with migrating to CentOS Stream? Why would that
> be so much worse than using Debian?
>
The OP made the choice. The
Hey all,
Just wondering here, why switching from CentOS to Debian or building BIND
from sources? What is wrong with migrating to CentOS Stream? Why would that
be so much worse than using Debian?
Regards,
Tom
On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 00:25, G.W. Haywood via bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wr
Hi there,
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, Leroy Tennison wrote:
... switching from an rpm world to a deb world
... Not an enormous change but significant.
Indeed. I'd suggest that if it's just about BIND, it's easier to grab
the source and build it. That way you don't ever have to wait for the
package
m. Not an enormous
change but significant.
From: bind-users on behalf of Bruce Johnson
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 1:12 PM
To: John Thurston
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: BIND through COPR after CentOS
CAUTION: This email origi
I’m evaluating Oracle Linux to replace CentOS right now for other uses, which
Oracle pinky-swears will always be free (beer and speech); it’s essentially
another RHEL clone, with some additional stuff for oracle in the repo. I think
it’ll end up replacing our CentOS 8 upgrade of ours.
Available
On Fri, Dec 18 2020, John Thurston wrote:
> We have been using the ISC COPR packages for BIND on CentOS. With the
> demise of CentOS, we (along with a few other people on the planet) need
> to consider where we will move our applications.
>
> We have been completely happy with the packages provi
2:31 PM
To: Victoria Risk
Cc: John Thurston ; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: BIND through COPR after CentOS
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is saf
I would add that the Debian packages are at:
* 9.11 https://bind.debian.net/bind-esv/
* 9.16 https://bind.debian.net/bind/
* 9.17 https://bind.debian.net/bind-dev/
Ondřej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
> On 18. 12. 2020, at 19:24, Victoria Risk wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 18, 2020, at 10:15 AM,
> On Dec 18, 2020, at 10:15 AM, John Thurston wrote:
>
> We have been using the ISC COPR packages for BIND on CentOS. With the demise
> of CentOS, we (along with a few other people on the planet) need to consider
> where we will move our applications.
>
> We have been completely happy with t
We have been using the ISC COPR packages for BIND on CentOS. With the
demise of CentOS, we (along with a few other people on the planet) need
to consider where we will move our applications.
We have been completely happy with the packages provided by ISC through
COPR. Does anyone want to offer
12 matches
Mail list logo
