RE: BIND still will not resolve

2009-02-02 Thread Ben Bridges
s.isc.org] On Behalf Of Ben Bridges > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:29 PM > To: S. Jeff Cold > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: RE: BIND still will not resolve > > It also appears that your name server (iceman) is configured to accept > IPv4 queries only from itself. &g

Re: BIND still will not resolve --now fixed

2009-02-02 Thread S. Jeff Cold
Thanks everyone who helped. You know you can look at something a hundred times and not see what is obviously wrong until someone points it out. Jc S. Jeff Cold, Associate Professor IS&T Dept., MS-181 Utah Valley University 800 W. University Pkwy. Orem, UT 84058-5999 (801) 863-8851 - offic

RE: BIND still will not resolve

2009-02-02 Thread Ben Bridges
atthew Pounsett > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:23 PM > To: S. Jeff Cold > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: BIND still will not resolve > > > On 02-Feb-2009, at 14:03, S. Jeff Cold wrote: > > > BIND list, > > > >Well, I thought I had t

Re: BIND still will not resolve

2009-02-02 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On 02-Feb-2009, at 14:03, S. Jeff Cold wrote: BIND list, Well, I thought I had this DNS problem licked with my ISP volunteering as a secondary name server, but I guess not. My server still will not resolve my jatec.us domain. Maybe I have something wrong in named.conf or the zone fi

Re: BIND still will not resolve

2009-02-02 Thread Rich Goodson
just at a glance I see a problem in your zone file: IN NS iceman.jatecus. ; The DNS server your NS record has jatecus as a TLD via you missing a . between jatec and us. same in your SOA for the reverse. @ IN SOA iceman.jatecus. ro

BIND still will not resolve

2009-02-02 Thread S. Jeff Cold
BIND list, Well, I thought I had this DNS problem licked with my ISP volunteering as a secondary name server, but I guess not. My server still will not resolve my jatec.us domain. Maybe I have something wrong in named.conf or the zone files? I can't figure it to be so difficult, but it j