Re: BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-04-01 Thread Frank Even
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article , > /dev/rob0 wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Frank Even wrote: >> > In this particular instance, the masters ended up under maintenance >> > shortly after these boxes rebooted, so they were unable to trans

Re: BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-03-27 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Frank Even wrote: > > In this particular instance, the masters ended up under maintenance > > shortly after these boxes rebooted, so they were unable to transfer > > the zone from them for another 2 hours. These boxes w

Re: BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-03-27 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Frank Even wrote: > The subject is about the only way I can think to describe a > situation we've run into recently. First here is the system: > > [root@dns]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 6.6 (Final) > [root@dns]# rpm -q bind > bind-9.8.2-0.3

Re: BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-03-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
What's the SOA? It's possible that the zones were not expired, so they were provided as saved on disk. Since BIND wasn't able to transfer newer versions, it continued providing old versions. On 26.03.15 12:48, Frank Even wrote: Yes, the old versions were provided on disk on initial load. But

Re: BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-03-26 Thread Frank Even
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas >> wrote: >>> >>> What's the SOA? It's possible that the zones were not expired, so they >>> were >>> provided as saved on disk. Since BIND wasn't able to transfer newer >>>

Re: BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-03-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: What's the SOA? It's possible that the zones were not expired, so they were provided as saved on disk. Since BIND wasn't able to transfer newer versions, it continued providing old versions. On 26.03.15 12:48, Frank Even wrote: Y

Re: BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-03-26 Thread Frank Even
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 26.03.15 11:34, Frank Even wrote: >> >> Zone files were in place for the necessary domains, but were outdated >> (assuming one of our updates broke something somewhere, they were all >> on average 3 months old). > > >> Here is wh

Re: BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-03-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 26.03.15 11:34, Frank Even wrote: Zone files were in place for the necessary domains, but were outdated (assuming one of our updates broke something somewhere, they were all on average 3 months old). Here is where the issue is. I've generally found if BIND fails to write the zone, it gener

Re: BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-03-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 26.03.2015 um 19:34 schrieb Frank Even: Zone files were in place for the necessary domains, but were outdated (assuming one of our updates broke something somewhere, they were all on average 3 months old) I guess the question really is, is this expected behavior or a bug? after 3 months th

BIND not loading into memory on first transfer

2015-03-26 Thread Frank Even
The subject is about the only way I can think to describe a situation we've run into recently. First here is the system: [root@dns]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.6 (Final) [root@dns]# rpm -q bind bind-9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2.x86_64 So, we got bit by a chroot permissions issue (unsure