jim.siffe...@tektronix.com wrote:
>Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2)
>as AD Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a
>single MS DNS server to our BIND 9 servers that handle recursion. Is
>there a reliable way to use multiple masters when slav
In message <87ce8771-dd51-47d5-984f-0bc61ebc0...@menandmice.com>, Chris Buxton
writes:
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:27 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > multi-master true; still assumes correct zone serial number
> > maintenance. It just prevents the warnings about serial number
> > going backwards whic
On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:27 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> multi-master true; still assumes correct zone serial number
> maintenance. It just prevents the warnings about serial number
> going backwards which is a normal side effect of having multiple
> masters vs a master with multiple addresses.
OK, wo
In message , Chris Buxton
writes:
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, onix.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD
> Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS se
> rver to our BIND 9 servers that
On Nov 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM,
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD
> Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS
> server to our BIND 9 servers that handle recursion. Is there a reliable way
> to use m
Hi all,
Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD
Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS
server to our BIND 9 servers that handle recursion. Is there a reliable way to
use multiple masters when slaving AD Integrated zones to
6 matches
Mail list logo
