Re: BIND NXDOMAIN {REP=5.1}

2014-09-25 Thread Mark Andrews
doesn't work as that is not how DNS wildcards work. Mark > -Original Message- > From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 23 September 2014 9:49 AM > To: Neil > Cc: bind-us...@isc.org > Subject: Re: BIND NXDOMAIN {REP=5.1} > > > You jus

RE: BIND NXDOMAIN {REP=5.1}

2014-09-24 Thread Neil
should return 192.168.0.1 Is something like this possible? Thanks Neil -Original Message- From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org] Sent: Tuesday, 23 September 2014 9:49 AM To: Neil Cc: bind-us...@isc.org Subject: Re: BIND NXDOMAIN {REP=5.1} You just have to break the wildcard matching

Re: BIND NXDOMAIN

2014-09-23 Thread Mark Andrews
You just have to break the wildcard matching. *. IN A 10.100.100.4 *.au. IN A 10.100.100.4 *.com.au. IN A 10.100.100.4 nooverride.com.au. TXT "break wildcard matching" nxreturn.com.au. TXT "break wildcard matching" Mark In message <00ab01cfd60d$1365a0a0$3a30e1e0$@iprimus.com.au>, "Neil" writes

BIND NXDOMAIN

2014-09-21 Thread Neil
Hi, We are investigating the features of NXDOMAIN redirect as explained in https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00376/0/BIND-9.9-redirect-zones-for-NXDOMAIN-r edirection.html We are running BIND 9.9 stream. My question is, Is it possible to "whitelist" particular domains?, The ARM does Not r