Re: BIND 9.9.0 assertion failure

2012-03-16 Thread Doug Barton
Is this something I should add to the FreeBSD port? On 03/14/2012 17:58, Mark Andrews wrote: > > We believe this patch will fix this issue. It has been committed to be > released as part of BIND 9.9.1. > > Mark > > diff --git a/bin/named/client.c b/bin/named/client.c > index 2f4130c..ae13795

Re: BIND 9.9.0 assertion failure

2012-03-14 Thread Mark Andrews
We believe this patch will fix this issue. It has been committed to be released as part of BIND 9.9.1. Mark diff --git a/bin/named/client.c b/bin/named/client.c index 2f4130c..ae13795 100644 --- a/bin/named/client.c +++ b/bin/named/client.c @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ ns_client_recursing(ns_client_t *c

Re: BIND 9.9.0 assertion failure

2012-03-14 Thread Cathy Almond
On 14/03/12 10:11, Eivind Olsen wrote: >> In BIND 9.9.0(CentOS 4.6) >> >> Mar 9 06:58:51 X named[17533]: general: critical: client.c:318: >> INSIST(client->newstate <= 3) failed, back trace

Re: BIND 9.9.0 assertion failure

2012-03-14 Thread Eivind Olsen
> In BIND 9.9.0(CentOS 4.6) > > Mar 9 06:58:51 X named[17533]: general: critical: client.c:318: > INSIST(client->newstate <= 3) failed, back trace This looks like a crash I just had here,

BIND 9.9.0 assertion failure

2012-03-08 Thread 김세훈
In BIND 9.9.0(CentOS 4.6) Mar 9 06:58:51 X named[17533]: general: critical: client.c:318: INSIST(client->newstate <= 3) failed, back trace Mar 9 06:58:51 X named[17533]: general: crit