On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 5:44:26 PM UTC+5:30, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Re: Again manasa.jamuna wrote:
>
> > Bind version used is 9.6.2-P2.
> > Named crashed ...
>
> No big surprise.
>
> > I did a google search ...
>
> Did you look at the ISC Website?
>
>
Hi there,
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Re: Again manasa.jamuna wrote:
Bind version used is 9.6.2-P2.
Named crashed ...
No big surprise.
I did a google search ...
Did you look at the ISC Website?
https://www.isc.org/downloads/
9.6.x has been End Of Life for nearly two years. Upgrade.
--
73,
Ge
On Friday, February 4, 2011 at 2:39:42 AM UTC+5:30, Juan O wrote:
> Thank you very much Mark.
>
> > To: cut...@hotmail.com
> > CC: bind-...@isc.org
> > From: ma...@isc.org
> > Subject: Re: Again Crashed Bind
> > Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 07:23:23 +1100
> >
&
Thank you very much Mark.
> To: cut...@hotmail.com
> CC: bind-us...@isc.org
> From: ma...@isc.org
> Subject: Re: Again Crashed Bind
> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 07:23:23 +1100
>
>
> Upgrade as recommended in CVE-2010-3613.
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
>
Upgrade as recommended in CVE-2010-3613.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.o
Hello.
In my company we'd got a bind v9.6.0-P1 running on a RHEL 5.4 server.
Last November the named process stopped. I revised the logs and I could see:
19-Nov-2010 13:21:32.572 query.c:1769:
INSIST(!dns_rdataset_isassociated(sigrdataset)) failed
19-Nov-2010 13:21:32.572 exiting (due t
6 matches
Mail list logo