Sure. Your decision, of course. But any network application is only going
to work if the underlying network supporting it doesn't do silly things
with its traffic.
On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 15:23, wrote:
> Thank you for all your assistance. I have made the decision to
> decommission Bind9 and insta
Thank you for all your assistance. I have made the decision to
decommission Bind9 and install Unbound in its place. There seem to be a
lot more configuration options that might help me with the problems I am
having. Problems I never had with Windows Server 2003.
Thanks anyway and take care of
>From the correct alias this time!
On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 22:46, Greg Choules
wrote:
> Your router (or your ISP behind it) is losing a lot of traffic. Here is a
> timeline of frames with explanations of each, which would have been so much
> simpler if you hadn't tried to hide your actual address
On 18.05.2025 19:53, bi...@clearviz.biz
wrote:
I include it because all of the packets
seem to have the same problem (the router attempts a ping to my
main server (ending in octet ".10"), which it claims the host is
unreachable. Not sure why tha
4 matches
Mail list logo
