On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:23:44PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <20170104010026.GA3160@ubuntu>, Nex6 writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:46:07AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 04.01.2017 um 01:35 schrieb Nex6:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 05:22:56PM -0800, Carl Byington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 16:35 -0800, Nex6 wrote:
> I have a very specific issue, where a partner org, wants me to add an
> > SRV record for there org. (i do
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:46:07AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.01.2017 um 01:35 schrieb Nex6:
> >I have a very specific issue, where a partner org, wants me to add an
> >SRV record for there org. (i dont want to)
> >
> >- NOTE: and its for a major cl
of so far, is build out a new DNS box for just the users
that need to use this application.
and add the SRV record there. but, not sure how you could setup a
secondary zone, thats writeable?
any thoughts on this?
-Nex6
___
Please visit https
5 sec TTL, with a lot of load balancer based rules. on a lot of servers…..
On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote:
>>
>> our parent org, owns the parent zone, and this zone is delegated from there
>> to a load b
> - Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Nex6|Bill
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 3:05 PM
> To: Barry Margolin
> Cc: comp-protoc
, so i am going to put a forward
zone directly from my NS to the load balancer which is auth for the zone. that
way, if the internet gateway is down or has issues the application will still
function.
-Nex6
On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:35 AM, N
My name server is not authoritative for it. but i want to verify once the
forward is in place the query is following the
forward and not the authoritative path.
On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:46 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Nex6|Bill wrote:
>
>> I am going to be adding
I am going to be adding a type forward zone for an important zone. how can i
test that the forward is working correctly? if i do a dig against the NS the
record will return no matter if its auth or fwd zone.
-Nex6
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
.
>
>Since you asked the question, what would you propose as an alternative
>for folks running multiple sets of nameservers with different info on them?
>
>John
>
>
>On 06/02/2014 04:52 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote:
>> so, stub zones allow you to point a zone to a different name
recently, a question came up about "stub" zones came up and what they are and
are they part of the DNS standards or are they a good idea. i said, they are
evil and should not be used if you can avoid it. they way I understand them is
the are when you create local zones for zones you are NOT aut
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas [2013-12-18 09:46:33 +0100]:
> On 17.12.13 17:05, Davis, Donald W wrote:
> >Sorry if this is the wrong forum for a Windows question.
>
> not for a windows questions...
>
> >Can clearing the Cache on Windows Domain Controller DNS server have any
> >impact on forwarding,
* Lance Bailey [2012-07-17 14:50:43 -0700]:
> On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:43:34 PM UTC-7, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > In message <20120717194840.GA3773@glasya2>, nex6 writes:
> > > when does bind or dns in general use tcp and when does it use udp?
> >
> > W
* Mark Andrews [2012-07-18 07:43:34 +1000]:
>
> In message <20120717194840.GA3773@glasya2>, nex6 writes:
> > when does bind or dns in general use tcp and when does it use udp?
>
> When it needs to. TCP support is NOT optional.
>
> > from what i have read,
about, recursive lookups? or forwarded requests? etc
how does that work?
-Nex6
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org
orward? or not
-Nex6
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
er failed.
> === e
> ; Transfer failed.
> === f
> === g
> === h
> ; Transfer failed.
> === i
> ; Transfer failed.
> === j
> ; Transfer failed.
> === k
> === l
> ; Transfer failed.
> === m
> ; Transfer failed.
>
> Tony.
what would be the benefits
* Phil Mayers [2012-06-27 14:29:38 +0100]:
> On 26/06/12 17:25, nex6 wrote:
> >* Phil Mayers [2012-06-26 16:54:55 +0100]:
> >
> >
> >I am not going to be editing files by hand, we actually have a tool. I am
> >more
> >concerned about best practices,
just create the missing zones and fix the
tools
so new networks always get reverse zones created.
becuase I dont think i can just create a larger /16 or /8. becuase they will
overlap and create a bigger mess.
-Nex6
> On 26/06/12 16:42, nex6 wrote:
> >* Brad Bendily [2012-06-25
ounces+brad.bendily=la@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+brad.bendily=la@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
> nex6
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 4:03 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Reverse zones best practices
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> look for some in
t;
>
>
> zone file for 230.16.10.in-addr.arpa has comment ; 10.16.230.0/23
> vlan : Purpose-of-vlan-here 10.16.230.0-10.16.231.255 (512)
>
>
> In this way, whoever looks at the zone, no matter how dns savvy they
> are, knows the size of the netblock
>
>
>
&g
ve 100s of defined mission critical reverse zones defined at the vlan
level of 10.x.x.0/24... my thinking, would be do a
discovery and create all the /24s, even if there is like 100s. instead of the
bigger super net...
what would be the best practice and the way to go
uxtonBlueCat NetworksI am not a huge fan of stub zones if they can be avoided. also, alot of forwarding is also bad, as it adds complexity'. tho, some forwarding is ok and even necessary.its much cleaner, to use TTLs, and have internal Nameservers that cache. just my 2 cents-Nex6 On Feb 28,
me servers that ensure good lookup times for oft requested zones.if your worried about "slow" lookups, or things always going out to the forwarder just make sure the local name servers caches are working. and check the TTLs for the zones your worried about.hope this helps clear things up.-Nex6
in the DMZ sorta thing.or have a few authoritative name servers, a several salves, so you may have salves in each datacenter. a delegation, is where you "delagate" a subzone to someone else. example, you own say example.org, and a subgroup wants to mana
25 matches
Mail list logo
